Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman approved of this idea. She related that she had looked for the plan on the Web site and <br />had discovered that it was a 94-page document. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy determined from the council that the item could be postponed until the work session <br />scheduled for May 11. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy moved on to Consent Calendar Item G. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor indicated that she opposed the entire project because she did not approve of this method <br />of forcing people to pay for assessments. She wished to find a way, in particular, to exempt the Eugene <br />Garden Club. She commented that it was not right to classify the club as a business. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein said the only way to exempt the Eugene Garden Club would be to exempt the <br />entire alley from the plan. He explained that the code established who would be assessed and one could <br />not change the code except by ordinance with a six-month lead time. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked if there was a way to change the club's classification. Mr. Klein replied that he <br />had not looked into this. He said that the item could be postponed. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor moved to table the item. The motion died for lack of a <br /> second. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman intended to vote against the motion. She did not believe there was any substantiation <br />that paving alleys reduced crime. She also thought it would set a precedent for City-initiated local <br />improvement districts (LIDs). She predicted that, coupled with the "relentless pursuit of infill" in existing <br />stable neighborhoods, it would create incompatible development and a huge financial burden on areas in <br />which alley improvements were made. She said mixed-use development, as currently proposed and <br />enabled by alley improvements, would replicate the exact problems that manifested in the West University <br />Neighborhood in other "inner-city" neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 applauded the work of Councilor Kelly and the West University Neighborhood Task <br />Force (WUNTF). He noted that the process had been underway for two years and had not arisen over <br />night. He thought the recommendations, of which alley improvements were one, had been the result of <br />careful review. He agreed there was a problem throughout the city and that the City should find a way to <br />finance and improve the alleys to a reasonable level of functionality and use. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly thanked staff for their involvement through the process. He noted that approximate <br />numbers were discussed with any inquiring property owner. Also, he said, similar estimations of cost <br />were discussed at the hearing. He pointed out that he lived in that neighborhood. He opined that <br />unimproved alleys held more trash and were more likely to be in neighborhoods that reflected that lack of <br />improvement. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman <br /> voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor hoped it would be possible to obtain information on how to reduce the assessment to the <br />Eugene Garden Club. City Manager Taylor responded that the council could choose to use its <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />