Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously, and the <br />bill was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Glen Mitterman, 795 Willamette, attorney representing the applicant, <br />requested Council to delay action for approximately three weeks. This <br />would give the owner an opportunity to develop ways to rehabilitate <br />the structure for a rental unit. He noted Ms. Graff, owner of the <br />property, had been hindered in her attempts to rehabilitate the <br />property by her husband. Subsequently, a divorce has taken place and <br />Ms. Graff feels she will be able to improve the property. She was <br />willing to cooperate with the City in any manner to see that the <br />structure is made safe in the meantime, with perhaps fencing the <br />property. He said it was not felt the building was a fire hazard to <br />other houses in the area and the electrical system was turned off. <br /> <br />Ray Willard, HCC, said staff felt the house was not worth saving. <br />However, he was in concurrence if Council wanted to delay action for <br />three weeks. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie wondered if Council could pass the resolution with conditions <br />to be worked out with staff so Council would not have to consider the <br />item again. Mr. Long said he was not sure the decision could be left <br />with staff. He said if Council decides tonight that it is a nuisance, <br />he was not sure staff could later determine that it was not. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to delay action to May 8. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />4/10/78--12 <br /> <br />Z3~ <br />