Laserfiche WebLink
<br />D. Liquor License New Outlet <br /> <br />Marie Callender's, 1300 Valley River Drive, (R). Manager said all <br />papers were in order and staff was recommending approval. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Warren Finley, 195 Blackfoot, manager of Marie Callender1s, was <br />available to answer questions. He said the request was for a hard <br />liquor license in the restaurant. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed there being .no further testimony <br />presented. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to forward with approval <br />to OLCC, subject to Code compliance upon completion. Motion <br />carried with all Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Bradley <br />voting no. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />E. Public Works Bid Awards (Attached) <br /> <br />Mr. Allen reviewed the various awards to be let, noting they were <br />opened April 4, 1978. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />John Smeed, 3655 Glen Oak Drive, spoke regarding Job No. 1438; he ~ <br />owned one-half interest in the northwest corner of the block. He <br />had no objection to paving the east half, but did object to paving <br />the west half between Lincoln and Lawrence and the north half between <br />10th and 11th. He said the proposed paving would affect him more than <br />any other property owner because he has 320 feet total and he would <br />benefit less at this time. He noted he needed $2,500 to make improve- <br />ments to an existing house on the property and that money would have <br />to be used to pay for the paving. He would not be against the improve- <br />ment if he were granted a ten-year tax exemption. <br /> <br />Birtha Patterson, 1061 Lawrence Street, spoke regarding Job No. 1438, <br />and was very much opposed to the paving. She noted she was a senior <br />citizen and simply did not have the money to pay for such an <br />improvement. <br /> <br />Glenn Smeed, 458 West 15th, was against the paving also (Job No. <br />1438). He noted if apartments were built in the area, the heavy <br />equipment would tear up the paving in the alley and would have to be <br />replaced. He felt there was no advantage to paving at this time. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony <br />presented. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4/10/78--13 <br /> <br />z~o <br />