Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />ClT~ <br />r-,cE' <br /> <br />Assessment Panel Hearing i~i'- :, ~: iJ 4'- Ii <br />April 17, 1978 ~.M.;" . <br /> <br />7'8,9,1"!11112'112J3,4,~:6 <br /> <br />Present: Council members Bradley and lieua11en, City Engineer Teitzel jI. <br /> <br />A. C.B. 1652--Levying assessments for paving Country Club Road from Valley River <br />Way to Delta Highway (1327--76-62) <br /> <br />No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br />Recommendation: Levy assessment as proposed <br /> <br />B. C.B. 1653--Levying assessments for 1/2~ levy on Various Planned Unit Developments <br />and property not previously assessed (76-1008) <br /> <br />Requests to be heard were received from Robert Scholl, representing Joseph W. <br />Green, and Wesley C. Dodge, representing First Free Methodist Church. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel explained that this assessment was being levied by authority of Section <br />7.180 of the Code. He stated that this is an assessment of 1/2~ per square foot <br />which is levied against property'annexed to the City after 1949. He further stated <br />that generally this levy is assessed at the time lateral sewers are installed, <br />however, since the advent of Planned Unit Developments some areas have been missed <br />and have not been assessed for this cost. He. stated that this assessment is an <br />attempt to catch up and that the city is presently trying to instigate a program <br />to catch these areas at the time of hookup to the sewer system. ~ <br /> <br />Robert Scholl, representing Joseph Green, spoke stating that Mr. Teitzel had <br />answered some of the questions he had regarding this assessment, however, he felt <br />it would have been more appropriate to assess the original owners of the property <br />rather than using the arbitrary system he felt was used in assessing the present <br />owner. He further stated that he wondered if this was not an encumbrance upon <br />property that should be picked up by title insurance companies. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel answered that the City has no way of assessing the original owners of <br />the property, that the assessment can only be levied against the property, and <br />since there was no lien, title companies would have no way to locate this encumbrance. <br /> <br />Mr. Scholl stated that he felt there should be some statute of limitations on <br />this type of charge. <br /> <br />Wesley Dodge, representing the First Free Methodist Church, spoke stating that <br />because of the length of time between the installation of the trunk sewers in the <br />area and this assessment he felt the. responsibility for this cost should go to the <br />City. He stated that the original owner of the property reaped the benefit of <br />an increased valuation to the property because of the improvement without having <br />to pay the levy and further reaped benefit when the property was sold. He stated <br />that he was not questioning the ordinance but the fact that so much time has <br />elapsed. He felt that due to the length of time from improvement to assessment <br />that unless there was a concrete reason for the delay the City should bear the <br />responsibility. <br /> <br />Recommendation: Levy assessment as proposed, however, further recommendation <br />that the opinion of the City Attorney be obtained with <br />regard to any legal time limitations. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1" <br /> <br />\~ <br />