Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />Assessment Panel Hearing <br />ern 17, 1978 <br />Page 2. <br /> <br />C. C.B. 1654--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within <br />Bonner Plat and sanitary and storm sewer to serve the area between <br />Bonner Plat and Bertelsen Road (1332--77-6) <br /> <br />No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br /> <br />Recommendation: Levy assessment as proposed. <br /> <br />D. C.B. l655--levying assessments for paving and sidewalk on Sunshine Acres Road <br />from Harlow Road to 150 feet south of Westward Ho (1315--77-10) <br /> <br />Request to be heard was received from Frederick luper, 250 Sunshine Acres Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel explained that the project was initiated by petition in October of 1976. <br />He reviewed the assessment costs. Mr. Teitzel stated that the petition was for <br />paving and sidewalk. Mr. Teitze1 further stated that he understood the conflict <br />regarding this assessment was that the property owners were under the impression <br />that the sidewalks which were constructed only on the west side of the street <br />would be assessed to both sides of the street. He further stated that he could <br />find no record that indicated this had been presented to the Council in this <br />manner. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Appearing before the panel were Frederick Luper, Ross Cowan of 270 Sunshine Acres <br />Drive, W. \~. Chenoweth of 498 Sunshine Acres Drive, Richard Wood of P. O. Box <br />105617 Eugene, and Gerald F. Towne of 570 Sunshin~ Acres Drive. It was generally <br />stated that before signing the petition for this project a meeting was held and <br />a representative of the City agreed that sidewalks could be constructed on the <br />west side of the street but assessed to both sides, due to the fact that owners <br />on the east side would not support the paving project because too much of their <br />frontage would have been taken. It was stated that property owners an the west <br />side of the street would not have supported the project without an agreement that <br />both sides would be charged equally for the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that according to Code it would be possible to assess both <br />sides of the street for sidewalk that was constructed on one side. <br /> <br />Recommendation: That the assessment be referred back to the Public Works <br />Department to be redone in order to split the sidewalk <br />costs between both sides of the street and that the <br />assessment be brought back before the panel at a later <br />date. <br /> <br />E. C.B. 1656--levying assessments for paving and sanitary sewer within Riggs <br />Subdivision (77-31--1375} <br /> <br />No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br />tit Recommendation: levy assessments as proposed. <br /> <br />2/10 <br /> <br />,s <br />