Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Obie said he would support a major commitment to mass transit, but <br />could not support a goal that could not be proven to be realistic. He <br />felt that not to be good planning. Mr. Porter said a goal should be <br />perceived as something that may never be obtained. but something that ~ <br />is to be strived for. He emphasized there was nothing magic about the ~ <br />year 2000. as transportation planning would not stop at that time. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie wondered, if in reality an eight-percent goal were achieved <br />by the year 2000, if the plan would be any different. Mr. Porter replied <br />not for the first five years, and he could not answer for the remainder <br />of time. Mayor Keller said that if. in fact, the 15 percent goal was <br />acceptable, then required facility planning has to be prepared no matter <br />what the percentages. Mr. Farah said that when the community starts <br />building the facilities, it will be necessary to look at what capacity <br />requirements are. If the plans are 'not reaching that transit goal, then <br />it will be necessary to look at what facilities will accommodate those <br />needs in another way. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith questioned whether the Planning Commission felt satisfied, if in <br />accepting the long-term goals. that the short-term planning would be <br />adequately addressed. Mr. Bernhard said that the Planning Commission <br />officially did not recognize the long-term goals but did make recommenda- <br />tions for some highways and noncorridor projects for the next five years. <br /> <br />Dave Rynerson, LTD, said the plan was primarily a street and highway <br />plan, rather than a transit plan. The reason for establishing long-range <br />transit goals was to do long-range street and highway planning. A transit <br />development program that is good would be included in the next annual <br />update and would include those types of short-range transit decisions. ~ <br />The plan envisions use of street,and highway money that is available and ~ <br />is looking at how to set pri orities for use of that money accordi ng to the <br />assumptions about long-range planning. <br /> <br />Mr. 'Lieuallen requested that the staff respond to the general east-west <br />and north-south movements along 6th-7th. 11th-13th, and 18th. He wondered <br />if the 6th-7th freeway were built, whether that meant there will riot be a <br />need to improve 18th Avenue. Ollie Snowden, L-COG, said the plan indicates <br />with the 6th-7th freeway that improvements on 18th would be less than <br />those required with just a widening of 6th-7th avenues. If the 6th-7th <br />avenue freeway were eliminated. there would be an increased level of <br />improvement needed on 18th. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen said he envisioned. with this plan. an end result of <br />major improvements in freeways going through largely residential areas, <br />with a resultant disruption in neighborhoods and the character of the <br />residential areas. He said spending the money with resultant negative <br />effects on neighborhoods would not really solve the problem because <br />growth would be so great and the improvements would attract people to make <br />more trips. He was concerned that when energy and fuel run out, the City <br />might be stuck with a vast monolithic monument. <br /> <br />5/3/78--10 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />.3/S <br />