Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> Lane Council of Governments, as the transportation planning agency, <br /> is working on the problems of carbon monoxide and photo-chemical oxidents. - <br /> Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (LRAPA) is concentrating on particu- <br /> 1 ate s . The L-COG process will be patterned after the T-2000 planning, but <br /> is not fully developed at this time. LRAPA and DEQ are using a citizen's <br /> advisory committee to develop the particulate plan. <br /> The AQMA ci ti z,en IS advi sory commi ttee is a 25-member group representing <br /> a broad base of local public and private interests. This group has the <br /> responsibility for analyzing the particulate problem, considering strategies <br /> for control, and agreeing on which controls seem most appropriate. To <br /> support the citizen's group, the LRAPA and DEQ staff will provide technical <br /> advice, strategy alternatives, and procedural clarification. <br /> The committee is responsible for considering air pollution controls on both <br /> traditional point and non-traditional area sources of emissions within the AQMA, <br /> and to some extent, outside the metropolitan area. The controls may be <br /> applied to both private and public agencies. Traditional sources are such <br /> facilities as power plants, veneer driers, boilers, and similar stationary <br /> sources. Non-traditional sources include road dust, open burning, motor <br /> vehicles, agricultural tilling, and others. <br /> Until the control strategy is approved as part of the state implementation <br /> plan, no new or modified major emitting facility may be constructed within <br /> the Eugene/Springfield AQMA. This means a facility with the potential to <br /> emit one hundred tons of pollution a year, or any source with the potential <br /> to emit 250 tons per year. It is permissible, as part of the plan, to <br /> institute an offset policy to comply with this restriction. Such a policy e <br /> could permit a new or modified source to acquire the "pollution quota" of <br /> an existing source. <br /> The timetable calls for the citizen's advisory committee, which is meeting <br /> approximately twice a month, to complete its analysis by the end of <br /> August. Discussion of alternative controls will take place during September <br /> and early October. During mid-October and November, selection of alterna- <br /> tives is scheduled, with final decision expected by mid-November. Open <br /> burning controls, however, will be delayed until the results of the summer <br /> field and slash burning monitoring program are available. Those decisions <br /> are to be completed early next year. The state is required to submit its <br /> draft to EPA by January and final by April. EPA is scheduled to reach its <br /> decision by July 1, 1979. <br /> Once the citizen's group has reached its local pollution control decisions, <br /> it will make recommendations to LRAPA and DEQ. LRAPA, after public <br /> hearing, is responsible for preparing, approving, and adopting rules for <br /> local pollution control within its jurisdiction. LRAPA will submit its <br /> approved rules to EQC. EQC, after public hearing, is responsible for <br /> approval and adoption of its rules, and incorporation as part of the state <br /> implementation plan to be signed by the Governor. EPA is obligated to <br /> make the ultimate decision on the state implementation plan. Once that <br /> approval has been made, the plan has the force of Federal law. <br /> e <br /> 7/26/78--6 <br /> 53' <br />