Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> . <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolu- <br /> tion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />VII I. LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT--Minutes distributed. e <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to approve Legislative <br /> Subcommittee minutes dated September 13, 1978. Moti on carri ed <br /> unanimously. I <br />IX. CALLING PUBLIC HEARING RE: WATER WITHDRAWAL FROM OAKWAY WATER DISTRICT <br /> October 4, 1978 <br /> Res. No. 3004--Calling public hearing October 4, 1978, re: Wi thdrawa 1 <br /> from Oakway Water District, that area annexed east of <br /> Arcadia Street, north of Harlow Road (Babcock)(AZ 78-6) by <br /> Boundary Commission Final Order No. 549, was read by number <br /> and title. <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolu- <br /> ti on. Motion carried unanimously. <br />X. SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENT <br /> Southeast corner of Berntzen and Concord; applicant: Ci ty of Eugene <br /> Public Works Department; SE 78-4 <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to approve the <br /> segregation of assessment. Motion carried unanimously. <br />A short recess was taken. e <br />Mr. Williams arrived. <br />XII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST--Memo and ordinance distributed. <br /> Manager said the proposed ordinance was an attempt to clarify the conflict <br /> of interest matter pertaining to City Councilors. Two areas are covered <br /> in the memorandum and the proposed ordinance: 1) The matters that City <br /> Council members are voting on; and 2) The matter of whether or not a <br /> particular firm can contract or do business with the City or buy property <br /> from the City because of a relationship with City Council members. He <br /> noted the matters were governed by both a State law and the city's charter. <br /> Ms. Benjamin said there were three general issues Council should remember: <br /> 1) State law prohibitions and guidelines; 2) Charter prohibitions; and 3) <br /> Quasi-judicial guidelines. She said it was unlawful for a City Councilor <br /> to use his/her position to obtain a gain for himself or a household <br /> member. The most direct concern is the Charter prohibition, which states a <br /> Councilor cannot use his/her position, which is a public trust, to benefit <br /> himself or a member of his household. <br /> She noted the proposed ordinance defined pecuniary interest, direct <br /> interest, personal interest, and present interest. Regarding "substantial" <br /> 9/2U/78--8 e <br /> b30 <br />~, - <br />