Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c , <br /> <br />t-. -t"e vacant alley on 2nd Avenue. The Historic Review Board felt that this <br />area could be treated separately from other areas in the Whiteaker Refinement <br />Plan, as this land is essentially vacant. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Miller, Mr. Farah said medium-high <br />density generally would allow 20 to 40 units per acre. He gave examples <br />around the city of such a density: Woodlands--23 units per acre; West <br />Amazon at 35th--20 to 35 units per acre; and a complex on the north side <br />of Roosevelt between Lassen and Foch at around 30 units per acre. He said <br />the Skinner Butte height limitation would impact this area in that a <br />building at 500-feet ground level or less could be built to only 40 feet <br />Q.bove ground. At a ground level above 500 feet, the building could be <br />over 40 feet above the ground. He noted the restrictions in the area <br />would probably make 40 units per acre unachievable and would result in a <br />density probably no higher than 20 units per acre. The Historic Review <br />Board also felt that the design review process would protect the area to <br />the south. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Otto Poticha, 259 East 5th Avenue, spoke in favor of the resolution. He <br />owned a property in the vacant area and noted his cooperation with the <br />neighbors and neighborhood organization over the last two-and-a-half years <br />in developing the Refinement Plan. He felt it ironic that the final issue <br />would come down to his development of a piece of property 150 feet by 150 <br />feet. Regarding the density issue, he said the problem was in defining <br />medium-high density. If it were defined by Creswell standards, it might <br />be eight units per acre. By New York standards, it could be 400 units per <br />acre. He felt that 20 to 40 units per acre was only slightly greater than ~ <br />RG zoning and felt it not to be a very high density. .., <br /> <br />Averill Bennett, 1815 North Danebo, owned property south between 2nd and <br />3rd. He said that when the area was changed to historic designation, it <br />did not change the density for his property. He was in favor of a higher <br />density designation for his property. He said it was economically unfea- <br />sible for him to remodel or tear down and rebuild his property with <br />medium-density designation. <br /> <br />Martha Filer, 235 East 3rd, was against the higher density designation for <br />the vacant land in the alley near 2nd Avenue. She said Mr. poticha's land <br />was not the only one in question, and said an owner of a much larger <br />parcel was very much in favor of the medium-density designation, which the <br />neighborhood organization supports. She said there were many blocks of <br />high-density in the Whiteaker Neighborhood. The vacant area is presently <br />1ow-density and by allowing medium-density, this would be a compromise <br />position between what the city needs for housing and what the neighborhood <br />wants to preserve the historical character. She said if the land is <br />vacant and it were zoned medium-density, that would be a great jump from <br />zero to 20 units per acre. She felt allowing 40 units per acre would make <br />it difficult to blend in with the other two blocks in the area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4/11/79--8 <br /> <br />21Cf <br />