Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> , <br /> is not going to be improved, it should be dissolved. In answer to Mr. , <br /> Haws' question, Manager said that staff should report on the possible <br /> financial implications city-wide if the City takes part in the funding . <br /> of those improvements. Improvements were not installed at the time <br /> that the PUD was approved. Other similar circumstances exist throughout <br /> the city and will have to be examined if City assumes responsibility. <br /> Planning Commission suggests that Council reconsider City's policy <br /> that deals with assessing the abutting property owners. <br /> Mr. French said that the Planning Commission's split vote evolved from <br /> question of who pays, and the effectiveness of the walkway. The <br /> easement allowed direct passage to a nearby school. There is no data <br /> on the amount of pedestrian traffic through the area at this time. <br /> In response to Mr. Obie's question, Mr. Don Gilman, Public Works, said <br /> that the cost to improve the area would be approximately $5,000. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Frank Spear, 3973 Cornell Way, abutting property owner, said that a <br /> petition has been filed from all four concerned property owners, <br /> stating that they are willing to pay for the easement. <br /> Steve Hanamura, 2060 Parliament, abutting property owner, addressed <br /> the vandalism problem and said that the easement is blocked by a fence <br /> at this time. He said that Mr. Abarr should not receive a letter for <br /> payment of easement as he is no longer owner. <br /> William Streede, 2090 Parliament, abutting property owner, spoke e <br /> against opening easement to the public. <br /> Public hearing was closed. <br /> Mayor Keller asked Manager to explain the cost to the property owners <br /> as opposed to the cost to the City. Manager said that it is an <br /> expensive project and, if the bill is passed, the payment for fencing <br /> must be considered in addition to the paving. He suggested that staff <br /> be given two weeks to acquire information on the impact of City's <br /> participation. <br /> CB 1913--Authorizing easement vacation located between Parliament Street <br /> and Cornell Way was read the first time by council bill number <br /> and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting that <br /> it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be read the <br /> first time and brought back to Council for final consideration at <br /> a later date. <br /> - <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 1979 Page 4 <br /> 335 <br />