Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> done to have the matter come before the Council. Ms. Miller felt it would be e <br /> helpful to have the extent of the problem and analysis from the Joint Housing <br /> Committee and discussion of the balancing of the variety of problems ranging <br /> from people on fixed incomes or those who prefer not to convert, people who will <br /> be displaced and where they might go, results and impact on central city housing <br /> patterns, etc. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to direct the staff <br /> and the Manager to get data from whichever departments are involved, <br /> and get back with a recommendation on the scope of the problems <br /> and the options within two weeks. <br /> Manager suggested that two months would be a better time frame. Mr. Lieuallen <br /> responded that it should be done now or it will not be timely. Ms. Schue <br /> wondered about simply having answers on whether a moratorium would be possible <br /> in two weeks. Mr. Lieuallen said that had really been the intent of his motion. <br /> Manager said that, as a compromise, within a month staff could have a status <br /> report laying the groundwork on whether there could be a moratorium. <br /> With consent of the second, Mr. Lieuallen altered his motion to <br /> that effect. Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unan- <br /> imously, and it was understood staff would have a status report in <br /> a month laying groundwork on whether there could be a moratorium. <br /> VI. STATE DEPARTMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REFERRAL ON <br /> PROPOSED MCKENZIE-WILLAMETTE PORT DISTRICT <br /> A draft of a letter has been presented to Council addressed to the Oregon - <br /> Department of Economic Development outlining concerns and comments of the Eugene <br /> Economic Development Committee, as developed at their meeting of September 11, <br /> 1979. Ms. Miller said the Committee suggested that the letter be redrafted to <br /> make it more positive in tone and more neutral, less expressive of its fears. <br /> Manager said that, as he understood it, the urban service boundary is the <br /> projected boundary. It does go through Glenwood. He said they have verbally <br /> promised they will not include property within. the City of Eugene. <br /> Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Ms. Miller, to approve the letter as <br /> drafted and forward to the State Department of Economic Development. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> VII. SCHEDULING OF MAJOR CAPITAL OUTLAY ACTIONS-- <br /> FISCAL IMPACT REPORT AND FURTHER DISCUSSION <br /> Manager said there is some urgency on these matters because of placing items on <br /> the November ballot. Ms. Smith said she would like to discuss the projects in <br /> more detail, and would therefore like to defer discussion until the Council <br /> retreat on September 20 and 21. <br /> e <br /> 52,0 9/19/79.--8 <br />