Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> IV. GROWTH MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION DISTRIBUTED) <br /> It was noted that review would begin with Proposal 7 on page 6 of e <br /> Attachment B. Any changes made at this meeting would be added to the <br /> changes already suggested. <br /> Proposal 7: Thi s proposal states that the Limited Access Charter Amend- <br /> ment should be repealed as it is depriving the City of state highway , <br /> funds. Jim Carlson said that during the public hearing several people <br /> suggested that it should not be repealed. Staff said the intent of the <br /> statement was to request further investigation. Mr. Obie felt it was <br /> quite a bold statement and it seemed to him that the Council does not know <br /> whether it is true or not. To say it should be repealed would not be, <br /> perhaps, in the best interests of Eugene, but to say it should be left <br /> alone might not be best either. <br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to change <br /> Proposal 7 to read: liThe City should consider the <br /> merits of the Limited Access Charter Amendment as <br /> it relates to planning, transportation, and finance.1I <br /> Mr. Delay said his own opinion is that it has probably been good for the <br /> community to not move ahead rapidly with limited access routes. Ms. <br /> Miller said she had not seen evidence to support the original language. <br /> She favored determining if, in fact, the Limited Access Charter Amendment <br /> is having a substantial adverse effect. Council could then take the <br /> appropriate action. Ms. Schue said her understanding of the present <br /> amendment is not that a limited access route would never be built, but e <br /> that it would not be built without receiving public discussion first. Ms. <br /> Smith feels it is necessary to have more thorough documentation in terms <br /> of funding. Any other information staff could provide would be very <br /> benefi ci a 1 . Mayor Keller said perhaps the Department of Transportation <br /> could come to a meeting and share their concerns. In a meeting he attended <br /> recently at which the Department of Transportation was represented, he <br /> learned that the freeway issue in Eugene is an obstacle to the DOT because <br /> a regional highway project is a ten-year project; and since there has been <br /> no public testimony to date, the Department is reluctant to commit itself <br /> that far in advance. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Haws left the meeting. <br /> Proposal 8: This proposal says that the City should explore the concept <br /> of a land tax which would exclude tax on improvements. Mr. Lieuallen is <br /> not sure what the words IIshould explorell mean and hopes that staff will <br /> provide some analysis of that. Assistant Manager said there are members <br /> e <br /> 515 10/17/79--10 <br />