Laserfiche WebLink
<br />asked Ms. Stevenson, the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and <br />Urban Renewal Agency for the County, how the State feels about payment in ~. <br />lieu of taxes. Ms. Stevenson said thE~re would be no problems with any <br />pilot programs. Mr. Lieuallen wondered if the 60 percent figure were <br />satisfactory to the State, and Ms. Stevenson said that she did not know <br />if that figure specifically was acceptable to the State. She said the <br />agreement is between the City and the Housing Authority, and the State <br />has not indicated any problems with such an agreement, as long as <br />other expenses are paid first. ManagE~r cl arified that the attorneys have <br />said there is no contract if it only states "after expenses are paid, <br />money wi 11 be received". To ensure pa.yment, more specif ic terms have to <br />be st ated . <br /> <br />Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve in concept the <br />contract amendment and allow the City Manager to negotiate the <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Manager noted that, of course, the school districts are the big sacrificers <br />and will lose the most revenue in this case. Ms. Stevenson also mentioned <br />that this is the first Section a project in the City. Others have been <br />HUD low-rent projects. Councilor Lieuallen indicated that perhaps a <br />clause in the agreement can specify that these payments be made to a fund <br />that could be used for further development. He also indicated that more <br />monies might be paid in the future when the project's residual reserve <br />is above HUD requirements. Ms. Schue questioned whether the Housing <br />Authority should be treated any differently than any other developer <br />involved in Section 8 development. <br /> <br />a:.. <br />'~- <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. <br /> <br />V. PROPOSED EXPEND !TURE REDEMPTION TO COMPENSATE FOR SHORTFALL IN GENERAL <br />FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1979 <br /> <br />Manager explained that the proposed expenditure reductions would allow <br />the City to end the year in the black. Each department was asked to <br />review its present budget and indicate how it might achieve a six-percent <br />reduction in expenditures by year-encl. After reviewing the departmental <br />proposals, revisions by the Manager's office will allow several departments <br />to project less than a six-percent cutback, specifically Parks, Library, <br />and Fire, while departments such as the Public Works Department are <br />implementing more than a six-percent cutback. In developing these <br />reductions staff attempted to follow the priority sheets developed at the <br />first of the budget year. Certain capital projects and capital outlay <br />items also have been suggested for dE~lay. In addition, a number of <br />unfilled positions have been frozen, some administrative and others <br />clerical. <br /> <br />Manager mentioned that some of the rl:!ductions were delaying the purchase <br />of two rapid attack vehicles in the Fire Department, and therefore <br />proceeding with the master satellite program more slowly, closure of <br />pools on a rotating basis, and Sunday closure of the Library. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1/2/80--4 <br />