Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. Manager requested a motion to authorize defense/indemnification <br />for himself, Mr. Long, et al, in the Karen Stein vs. City of <br />Eugene action. 4It <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to authorize defense/ <br />indemnification for Mr. Henry, Mr. Long, et al, in the Karen Stein <br />vs. City of Eugene action. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Haws' question, Mr. Long said that State law <br />provides defense and indemnification if a public employee is <br />acting within the course and scope of employment according to <br />established programs and policies. There is an obligation by <br />statute to pass a motion to this effect. He added that most of <br />the cost will be paid by the insurance company. <br /> <br />Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />II. MAHLON SWEET FIELD MASTER PLAN--STAFF PRESENTATION (Memos Distributed) <br /> <br />Manager introduced topic and stated the presentation was to be a summary <br />, of the highlights of the Mahlon Sweet Field Master Plan and to define the <br />two issues which may arise in the public hearing at the February 11, 1980, <br />City Council meeting. One of those issues is the location of the general <br />aviation runway; the other relates to land use questions and the processes <br />to be followed in authorizing zoning for land use for property in the <br />vicinity of the airport. Manager introduced Bob Shelby, Director of <br />Aviation, who presented a summary on the revised, updated blueprint for ~ <br />the airport. He noted that the first six pages of the report are the ~ <br />conclusion/recommendations. He also noted that the distributed memos <br />covered decisions made by the Planning Commission on a process determining <br />the land use. <br /> <br />He indicated a public hearing, conducted by Bob Talbot, Chairman of the <br />Airport Commission, was held November 13, 1979. <br /> <br />The location of the new runway was determined after a careful analysis of <br />six different developmental schemes. The chosen location had the least <br />environmental impact, the least capital investment, and the greatest <br />, airfield capacity. This is a $17.5-million developmental plan to the year <br />2000, which will form the basis for Federal funding to be channeled into <br />Eugene. Of that, $4.4 million of the work has been accomplished during <br />the time the Master Plan was being developed. Federal participation will <br />mean the "City's share" will be approximately $3.8 mi 11 ion. <br /> <br />The Economic Feasibility Study, conducted by the consultant, showed the <br />plan to be economically feasible, thereby indicating that the Airport will <br />continue to be self-sufficient. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/6/80--6 <br />