05/07/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chapter I is an introductory chapter stating the purpose of the plan. ... It also introduces the use of the plan and the relationship of this ~ plan to other plans and policies as well as to the statewide planning goals and others. Chapter I also includes general findings and assump- tions (employment, population, etc.). There was disagreement as to whether these findings and assumptions should be included. Chapter II is the most important part of the plan. It lists the metro- politan goals, growth management in the urban service area, Eugene and Springfield jurisdictional responsibility, urban and urbanizable land, the plan diagram, and maps. Chapter III contains specific elements of the plan. The State goals have been adopted since the 1990 Plan was done. Chapter IV is a plan review showing amendments, refinements, and juris- dictional responsibility. Chapter V is a glossary of the plan which contains special terms and definitions for easier understanding. Steve Gordon stated that in addition to the plan and the background information, an erratum sheet was distributed. Because of the Planning Commission's final action last Wednesday, the first area of disagree- ment in the update should be changed to concurrence. On page I-I also is the general purpose of the plan. Page I-2 con- ~ tains the plan contents summary; page I-3 includes uses of the plan, .., definitions for findings and assumptions, and the relationship between the plan and the goals, objectives, and policies. I-3-a states that there are 54 suggested recommendations or areas for additional study which do not necessarily have to be undertaken immediately. Page I-4 states the relationship of this plan to other plans and policies. This page also shows the relationship of the plan to the plan diagram. Page I-5 shows the two statements, one of which must be adopted, regarding the Gateway Park Development area and the North Springfield area. Page I-6 shows the relationship of this plan to the County sub- area plans, statewide planning goals, and the technical supplement and working papers. Page I-8 shows the general findings and on item 7 at the top of the page there is now concurrence. Jim Carlson stated that on page I-7, General Assumptions, it was first necessary to prepare general assumptions, including population and employ- ment, before this update could be done. He presented graphs which were distributed as well as visual aids for clearer understanding. They project that in the next 20 years, there will be a 55-percent increase in popula- tion, mostly due to immigration. At the present time, approximately 2.8 persons per dwelling will be compared to approximately 2.3 persons per - 5/7/80--12