Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Funds will be available for site preparation. The station would not <br />be built until 1981-82 at the earliest. For electricity, the property <br />would be served by two jurisdictions, Lane Electric Coop and EWEB. <br />In regard to schools, District 4-J has concerns over school ' <br />capacity. Access to the lower elevations is possible through <br />Warren Street, but access to the southern portion would require <br />road extension. Staff's original recommendation was to post- <br />pone this, but the Planning Commission took the hearings official <br />authority into consideration and feels this should go <br />under the City's jurisdiction rather than the Countyls. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen asked how the County would feel about developing <br />this area. Mr. Byrne responded that limited development could <br />take place under County jurisdiction. He thinks it is highly <br />unlikely that this would occur. <br /> <br />No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were noted. Staff <br />notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing <br />was opened. <br /> <br />David Williams, 975 Oak Street, No. 600, indicated this matter <br />was postponed due to the Cone/Breeden decision. He feels the <br />legal issues have been addressed; this is now a planning issue. <br />The annexation makes sense. The Planning Department will still <br />need to consider soil types, the slopes, the scenic issue, etc. <br />The property has been planned for urbanizing for some time. <br />It presents no problems with the LCDC goals. There is a need <br />to annex vacant land to the City. He noted that he had sent a <br />letter for the council to Greg Byrne. This property can be con- <br />sidered a resource for planned development as actual development <br />would be at least two to five years away since it is a planned <br />unit development. This will meet housing needs in the future. <br />The City should supervise the planning for this area, and annex- <br />ation will be ensuring that this happens along City policies. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Smith asked Mr. Barkman if there is additional information <br />from the agencies that would be providing services. Mr. Barkman <br />responded that these concerns had been addressed. They were <br />primarily concerned about fire protection service, but thought <br />that this could be taken care of during the PUD process. They <br />recognized this area as one suitable for urban development. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5/12/80--10 <br />