06/23/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

with Ms. Smith regarding schedul ing a work session. During that work session, he wo~ld like to see the question raised as to whether as a general practice staff should present more than one opinion to the council on difficult issues. e Ms. $ehue said she would be glad to have the entire council go over the issues since she has been struggling for months. She also stated that she felt it would;be good to accept .Ms. Miller's ,suggestion of replacing a councilor with a representative from MAPAC. She would also like to see a representative from the neighborhoods added. She does not feel that additional planning commis- sioners should be added to the committee. Councilor Obie suggested that a report from the two councilors on this committee stating the issues and their recommendations might be helpful. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to accept the report and Citizen Involvement Program revision~ and to schedule a work session after a Wednesday council meeting with the City Council and Citizen Involvement Committee to discuss the committee.s role and membership at that time. Roll Call vote; motion carried unanimously. Recess was called. D. Consideration of 1980-81 Annual Budget , Mr. Henry stated there have been many public hearings on the budget but tonight there is a requirement to have this meeting although action will not be taken until Wednesday, June 25. One of the items, the County Museum Commission, will be brought back to council on June 25. Several items (corrections, adjustments, and updates) have been distributed to the council. In the general fund/revenue .- sharing, there is a net increase of $10,814, consisting of an $18,702 reduction in community schools in the executive department, a $576 reduction in the Fire Department, a $31,350 increase in reappropriation for professional service contracts for projects not completed by June 30 in the Planning Department, an $11,668 increase to cover the LEIC dues for 1980-81 which is a shift from contingency funds in the Planning Department, an $11,668 reduction in general contingency to cover the increase in the LEIC dues in Planning which is non- departmental, and a $1,258 reduction in minor corrections to appropriations. There is a net increase in the Downtown Development District fund of $5,100, which is an increase in reap~ropriation of capital outlay for purchase of a new cash register syste~ not purchased in 1979-80 and is covered by increased net working capital, a net increase of $71,848 in the Eugene Renewal Agency early close-out fund to assist in development and booking of the new Conference Center, a net increase of $2,240,000 in street and sewer capital project funds in the Public Works Department, which is the loan repayment to this fund for the 1979-80 loan to the Park5 and Recreation Department's acquisition fund--they may not be doing this again this year; it depends upon the sale of the Park bonds--a decrease of $14,298 in CETA fund due to refinement in staff-time allocations, a net increase of $2,500 in the sewage disposal fund in the Public Works Department ~. e 6/23/80--10