My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/23/1980 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1980
>
07/23/1980 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:21:03 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:41:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/23/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> < , <br /> Mr. Delay asked if the City's cooperation with the seed ~rowers helped in <br /> averting the disaster. Mr. Smith replied it very defini ely did. He said <br /> the conditions yesterday, took hour-by-hour tracking; it was caught and <br /> the burning was stopped. Mr. Delay asked if the City's monitoring of the . <br /> daily ambience was working. Mr. Smith replied it was. <br /> - <br /> Mr. Lieuallen moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve the staff <br /> recommendation with respect to burning around Airport property. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Obi e commented that it was a bi g day for the Eugene City Council when <br /> they approved field burning. <br /> VI. VARIANCE PROCESS <br /> Mr. Delay commented that the variance process, as presently constituted, <br /> is very time-consuming. Mr. Perkins started this process in April and <br /> unless the request had been expedited it would not have been resolved until <br /> August or September. Too many levels of bureaucracy can consume a lot of <br /> time. The current process is difficult for staff to work with, it is <br /> difficult for the appellant to work with, and it is difficult for the <br /> Hearings Panel. He wondered if during the code update some attention <br /> could be given to the variance process and procedure. <br /> Manager said that they could explore the trade-offs. He did not think it <br /> should be related to the code update, but that it should be an independent <br /> consideration and process. Mr. Delay asked for initial consideration by <br /> staff. If it were a large project, council should decide if it should be e <br /> pursued. <br /> Ms. Smith asked for a report back on posGible changes to the variance <br /> process. Manager said that it would be done. <br /> Mr. ,Perkins spoke from the audience. He felt that the main concern was <br /> with buildings that have to be moved. House moves are difficult in the <br /> central city. If the City wishes to infill and preserve existing <br /> structures, there has to be some relaxation in order to speed up the <br /> process of variance appeals. <br /> Mr. Haws left the meeting. <br /> VII. PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CONTRACT AWARDS--PHASE 4 (memorandum distrubuted) <br /> Manager referred to the supplemental agenda. He explained that the <br /> request was for approval of bids for Phase 4 construct ion. The bids were <br /> received June 26 in some 13 categories. There were substantial overruns. <br /> Since that date, staff, architects, consultants, and contractors have been <br /> 7/23/80--6 . <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.