Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> would pay the cost. She will only dedicate her property if she can get a <br /> building permit to build a second dwelling. She feels the City took over from <br />e the real estate firm and builders who saw to it that the street is put in <br /> although they do not own the property. She feels that she was lied to by the <br /> developers. She is going to make a trip to Salem with the evidence. She feels <br /> this should have been straightened out before development was allowed. She <br /> stated that Councilor Obie had at first told her not to pay the assessment and <br /> has since changed his mind. <br /> Speaking in favor: <br /> Mr, Willard Robinson stated that he supports the recommendation not to resurface <br /> 19th Avenue and that his neighbors agree with him. <br /> Speaking in regard to bid 3: <br /> Kathy Stallings stated that she owns a lot in the Craviotto-Stratton Subdivision <br /> and that their property is being assessed for a storm sewer which is of no <br /> direct benefit to them. She disagrees with the method the City uses for levying <br /> assessments in subdivisions. The costs are divided equally regardless of the <br /> improvement. Her lot does not border the improvement and the improvement will <br /> not enhance the value of her lot. Those lots outside the subdivision were not <br /> assessed. She feels this causes a subdivider to jockey the selling prices. She <br /> would recommend that the City review this procedure. <br /> There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. <br />e Bert Teitzel, Engineering Division, stated that in regard to Orr lane, right-of- <br /> way was not obtained from the lot in question; therefore the full street could <br /> not be bui 1t, They have asked for an easement for a 20-foot-wide street. Two <br /> property owners gave the easement but the third would not. The street is being <br /> paved in the areas that can be done. This street gets muddy in the winter. <br /> They are not putting in a street where they do not have right-of-way. Ms. <br /> Willie does not have enough property to subdivide under the present City Code. <br /> Minimum lot standards would have to be lowered for her to be able to do this, <br /> In regard to the storm sewer, the City has standard procedures where, as a <br /> condition of the subdivision, the subdivider is required to provide for certain <br /> improvements. This can be done by equal lot assessment or per-square-footage <br /> assessment if the lots are not equal. He does not feel this procedure should be <br /> changed. <br /> Mr, lieuallen asked if these people who do not border the sewer will have <br /> runoffs that will drain into the storm sewer. Mr. Teitzel responded that they <br /> wou 1 d . He noted that there are lots that will benefit more directly but that <br /> this one will also benefit. Mr. Henry commented that they perhaps do not <br /> benefit as directly as some but that they will benefit. Mr. lieuallen asked if <br /> the storm sewer is a requirement for the lot, Mr. Teitzel stated that that was <br /> a requirement of the subdivision as certain public improvements must be met in <br /> order for the property to be subdivided. Mr, lieuallen asked if this system <br /> should be re-evaluated. Mr. Teitzel stated that it should not. He corrected an <br /> earlier statement by saying that the lot outside the subdivision will be assessed. <br />e <br /> 9/8/80--13 <br />