Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. community has done. Regulations at Beall Hall at the University protect the <br /> paintings by limiting smoking to the outdoors. She has difficulty with fifty <br /> percent of the area allowing smoking, as this might mean there would not be a <br /> non-smoking area since the smoke from one area would go to the other section. <br /> She would encourage that this be taken into consideration with the ordinance. <br /> She feels this is the first step toward a cleaner environment. <br /> Trig Kjelland, 26~1 Newcastle, is in favor of the ordinance. He lost his <br /> voice box because oT smoklng cigarettes and has worked for 14 years with the <br /> Cancer Society explaining the hazards to youth allover the state. He related <br /> his experience. He also teaches others to talk again after losing their larynx. <br /> James Lanz, R.N., 934 Washington, nurse, stated that ample medical opinions <br /> have already been stated regardlng the dangers of breathing smoke from smokers. <br /> The ordinance might not ~e necessary if business managers ensured others would <br /> not have to breathe smoke, but this has not happened so he urged the council to <br /> support the ordinance without further deletions. He is disturbed when he has <br /> to breathe smoke, but there are only three options: to breathe the smoke, <br /> to leave, or not to go out. He is pleased that food stores and laundromats are <br /> included in the ordinance. In regard to the 50 percent rule, if the room is <br /> small and 50 percent of the area is set aside for smoking, smoke can go through <br /> the whole room. He feels small areas should be either all smoking or all <br /> non-smoking. This is a public health problem. <br />. ~l Zarth, 4315 Hilyard, stated that cigarette smoke is a poison and is pois- <br /> onous to those who breathe it. It is unconscionable. He feels that places <br /> for workers should be made reasonably free of smoke. <br /> Bob Gregg, waived his rights to testimony. <br /> Bruce ~nderson, 4240 Hilyar9, stated that he supports the proposal, but does <br /> not W1Sri to condemn smokers and smoking. Each group should be given a choice. <br /> Many polls show it is becoming more evident that Americans favor restrictions on <br /> smoking areas. The March 27, 1980, New, Enfland J9urnal of Medicine published a <br /> study by White and Froeb, which concludes hat people exposed to smoke in the <br /> work place over periods of 20 years or more have reduced small airways functions <br /> as measured in the lungs equal to smoking half a pack a day. The ordinance is a <br /> reasonable attempt at striking a balance. The cost of doing nothing must be <br /> compared with the cost of restricting. Not until 1920 did large numbers of <br /> people smoke in this country. The July 16, 1980, article in the Wall Street <br /> Journal shows that smoking causes more severe internal problems. Internal alr <br /> quality needs to be controlled. The ordinance is needed now and needs to be <br /> expanded in the future. It is time to take this step, and he suggested that the <br /> council pass this ordinance and review it in 12 months. He suggests staff get <br /> information from states which have enacted stricter ordinances than this one. <br /> It is necessary to speak out when it is time to make a change and this is part <br /> of what has made Eugene a worthwhile place to live. <br />. <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 10, 1980 Page 9 <br />