12/08/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ . Due to lack of time, James Branch and Dennis Urso were unable to testify. In rebuttal: Mr. Roseta stated that if that letter had been part of the staff notes, he had not received it. There has been no comparison that he is aware of, just con- clusionary remarks. The slide shown was not in the record previously nor was it requested to have the record opened in order to substantiate it. He does not recall ever having seen the letter dated September 5, 1980, but stands corrected if it was a part of the staff notes. His real concern is access and he does not care if development occurs. There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. Mr. Long stated that the council should consider only the information that is in the record and not anything else. Mr. Obie stated that he is concerned about the number of cars that will be using this street and asked if the council is in a position to accept, review, or to modify the findings. Mr. Long stated that the council has complete authority to affirm, modify, or deny. Mr. Obie stated that some information states that Dogwood and Kimberly are each 28-foot-wide streets and Spring Boulevard is 36 feet wide. Other information . indicates that Kimberly is 32 feet wide. He asked for the correct information. Mr. Hanks stated that he did not know but would supply the information later. Ms. Smith asked what consideration has been given for modification of traffic patterns to tie into Kimberly during construction. Mr. Hanks stated that in Mr. Spickerman's findings, construction traffic would go on Spring Boulevard to Agate Street. Ms. Smith stated that this should alleviate the construction traffic. She asked what the projections are for a traffic light being placed at 30th and Agate. Mr. Hanks said that they could request that a light at 30th and Agate be placed on the County's priority list. Mr. Obie asked if a standard subdivision could develop at four units per acre. Mr. Croteau stated that they could go from 3.5 to 4.5 units per acre. Mr. Delay asked for clarification regarding council consideration of the infor- mation Jim Hanks provided on the estimtes of traffic volume. Mr. Long stated that one should consider what is in the record and it is fair to consider testimony regarding interpretation of the record. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to uphold the findings of the Hearings Official granting approval for the residential planned unit development and to direct the Hearings Official to work with the developer regarding access on Spring Boulevard, Kimberly, and Dogwood. . MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 8, 1980 Page 9