My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/16/1981 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1981
>
09/16/1981 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:40:49 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:48:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved <br /> and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present <br /> voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18868. <br /> Mayor Keller asked staff to monitor the situation for any incidents that might <br /> result and if that is the case, he requested a report back from the Police <br /> Department. Mr. Gleason indicated a report would come back in 90 days. <br /> V. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM--UPDATE (memo distributed) <br /> Mr. Gleason introducted Chris Hofmann, HCC. <br /> Ms. Hofmann stated that the funding application was submitted to HUD last <br /> spring. In July, they received notification of a two-month delay from HUD. <br /> Most issues have been resolved. Staff will come back before November with <br /> Community Development Committee recommendations. A subcommittee came up with <br /> recommendations which are outlined in the memo. She asked that the council <br /> forward any ideas to her. A public hearing will be held September 29, 1981, to <br /> present a staff outline. <br /> Mr. Lindberg stated that as a member of the subcommittee, he felt that the work <br /> was productive. HUD decided they did not like the City's application and John <br /> Bonham consulted with CDC and staff. There has been a loss of communica- <br /> tion since then. It is apparent that the Federal government is moving in the <br /> direction of using its own ideas on how the City can address neighborhood needs. <br />e He has been in contact with others who have been in negotiations with their <br /> district office and what is occurring in Eugene is unique. He feels Eugene may <br /> be suffering first but the City and council need to examine how they can redesign <br /> the neighborhood services. This has shifted into a phase similar to the War on <br /> Poverty where the Federal government dumped money into neighborhoods for a time <br /> and then it was taken away from them. The City needs to pay special attention <br /> to make the phasing process an easy transition to avoid the kinds of things which <br /> have destroyed neighborhoods in the past. Within 50 feet of the West University <br /> Community Center, a sign has been erected saying that that was the location of <br /> an attempted rape. Four months ago they had an anti-crime program which would <br /> have addressed problems such as that. Now the neighborhood group is restricted <br /> to brick-and-mortar projects. He has a number of recommendations for the <br /> council to consider: <br /> 1. Continuing to negotiate with HUD, going over the heads of the district <br /> office, to clarify whether there has been a change in the interpretation <br /> of the law. However, this could be costly. <br /> . <br /> 2. There has been input that HUD's major complaint was with the high <br /> level of administrative cost in the budget. He would hope that in the <br /> process of designing a three-year plan, staff could look at the <br /> administrative cost problem and look at HCC's relationship with the <br /> Finance Department's charges as well as others. <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 16, 1981 Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.