Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> C. Alley Direction Change--Oak/Pearl and 10th/11th (SC 81-1) <br /> (map distributed) <br />e Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. <br /> Res. No. 3583--A resolution establishing that the east/west alley and the <br /> north/south alley between Oak Street and Pearl Street and <br /> 10th and 11th avenues be changed from two-way to one-way <br /> east and north respectively. <br /> Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. <br /> Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> IV. FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE REGULATING THE SIGNING OF PRIVATE <br /> AND PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES (memo and additional information distributed) <br /> Mr. Gleason introduced Pat Larion, Police Department. <br /> Mr. Larion stated that as a result of the public hearing held last week, staff <br /> had met with citizens representing the Police Department, the attorney for <br /> Emerald Towing, two citizens, and the City Attorney to discuss concerns. The <br /> ordinance was designed to address the concerns. Section 1 of the ordinance will <br /> remain the same. A compromise was reached on Section 2 which would allow <br /> scheduled rates for impounding and connecting vehicles to be displayed with a <br /> statement stating that there is no fee until the vehicle is connected. This <br /> could be done by magnetic or other type of sign and should be visible from 20 <br />e feet. Section 3 requires signs for parking facilities before unauthorized <br /> vehicles are towed or impounded. The signs should be displayed and they should <br /> be not less than 3 square feet but no larger than 10 square feet. He showed <br /> samples. As the ordinance is written now, property owners would have three <br /> alternatives for signing: posting entrances to lots, posting the lot with a <br /> sign, or posting each parking space with signs not less than 1 square foot and <br /> no larger than 3 square feet. Also, they eliminated the requirement for phone <br /> numbers since owners of impounded vehicles must contact the Police Department <br /> anyway. This should help to eliminate disputes between owners and towing <br /> companies over rates. This will address the problem of inadequate signing in <br /> many lots. Staff suggests that this be reviewed in 90 days to see if the <br /> concerns have been met. <br /> Alan Ludwick, 1717 Centennial, stated that the issues presented were in agreement <br /> with the draft ordinance. He is not sure the ordinance will address the problems <br /> at the scene of a tow, but there will not be negotiations at the scene. The <br /> posted rate will be the imposed rate and if the owner of the impounded vehicle <br /> does not have the money, then there will be no choice but to impound the <br /> vehicle. The towing company owners were afraid their vehicles would be defaced <br /> by signs, but the compromise will work well. Rates will be posted for discon- <br /> necting, impounding, and stating that there will be no fee if a vehicle is not <br /> connected. The requirement will be only for three lines of wording. Also, <br /> implementation of that section of the ordinance requiring the posting of parking <br /> facilities with signs of a specific size and wording is deferred until <br /> November 15, 1981, tQ allow property owners adequate time to comply. Until that <br />- <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 16, 1981 Page 8 <br />