Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> c~ , <br /> ~ <br /> . !.. <br /> ~,,' . ~ writing. They supported prompt acknowledgment of the Plan by <br /> 1>" ...:'~~ LCDC and by the Councils and Commission. <br /> . <br /> ~>. , 2. <br /> 'G Dennis Cuddeback, 3470 McKenzie View Drive, Lane County <br /> Planning Commission. He indicated three, areas of concern: 1) <br /> private property near the airport; 2) Plan policies for River <br /> Road/Santa Clara, and 3) interim services for industrial and <br /> m <br /> 11 commercial firms outside the two cities. <br /> Id <br /> 3. Tom Bowerman, 33707 McKenzie View Drive, Eugene. He <br /> >e <br /> expressed concern about the North Gateway area, east of <br /> Deadmonds Ferry and Baldyview Lane. He contended the area is <br /> gn in the flood plain, \\lith rich soil which allows steady input into <br /> as our economy through farming. Occasional floods would possibly <br /> s. threaten new businesses. The owner is not in agreement to sell. <br /> to 4. Richard Miller, (see also written testimony, page III -F-1, <br /> ho III-T-l _.. <br /> and III-W-1) 2460 Malabar, Eugene, OR 97403, he represented <br /> or <br /> Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce in supporting current draft <br /> of Metropolitan Plan and the amendments recommended by the <br /> .ry Elected Officials Coordinating Committee and the Eugene Planning <br /> , Commission. The Chamber still has concerns about Eugene's <br /> . s <br /> proposed Special Light Industrial Zoning Ordinance, but the <br /> Chamber is optimistic that the ordinance will finally include <br /> of provisions which will allow flexibility for development. <br /> lat <br /> (. As attorney for Delta Sand and Gravel, Mr. ~1iller expressed <br /> concern for restrictions ,to sand and gravel operations at the <br /> few confluence heronry. The owners are protective of the heronry. <br /> ~rd The 300 foot buffer may be a little more than necessary and the <br /> ten public is largest threat to the heronry. <br /> ere Otto t'Hooft asked the <br /> ion if ~1r. ~1i ller had a position on Planning <br /> the Commissions' industrial concerns and Hr. Miller stated he was not <br /> ing authorized to make any statement on that issue on behalf of the Chamber <br /> and at this time. <br /> lral Scott Lieuallen asked about the English Study on the heronry. <br /> of 5. Dav id \H lliarns , 975 Oak 1160, Eugene, OR 97405, felt special light <br /> fOl industrial site, part icu larly West Park, should allow compatible <br /> other commercial and industrial uses and set aside part of each <br /> site for special light industrial use. \vithout that flexibility, <br /> r 6 private property m>lners are required to land-bank those sites <br /> for special light use - which may or may not happen within a <br /> reasonable time period. <br /> . <br /> ) 6. John <br /> Mehringer, (see also written testimony, page I II -G-1 and <br /> III-If-I) 165 W. Hilliard, Eugene, Or 97404. He expressed <br /> concern over several apparent vio lat ions of newly enacted Oregon <br /> nin, Statutes found both in LCDC acknowledgement document of June <br /> 't_ 12, 1981 and the proposed amendments to the Metropolitan Plan, <br /> as found in document Summary of Proposed Hetropolitan Plan <br /> Amendments, dated November 1981 and prepared by L-COG. In <br /> 11-3 <br />