Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I j ~.'" <br />\~: . J <br />\ ' <br />\ ,.' <br />I . ' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />this light, he discouraged mandatory sewage systems, ~"" <br />promoted continued use of septic tanks in the River Road/Sa ' <br />Clara area. He brought attention to the flow report prepared .,~ <br />CH2M-Hill for the City of Eugene and requested Council andl <br />Commission to review figures, "Sewer System of Agricultural! <br />Survey". He felt it defies logic to take the premise that thel <br />groundwater is contaminated, that it is most contaminated in a' <br />sewered area, and arrive at the conclusion that the resolution is! <br />still more sewers. He felt while a procedure for pUblic! <br />involvement exists, the content and substantive result of th{ <br />public involvement is ignored. ; <br />I,' <br /> <br />7. Marie Gray, (see also written testimony III-A-l and 1II-J-l), 3~ <br />Knoop Lane, Eugene, OR 97404. She felt there are deaf ears td <br />Goal 1 requirements as the wording still remains "City of Eugene: <br />to provide Urban Services" for River Road/Santa Clara area, <br />She felt sanitary sewers were possible only if and.-when the <br />Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is completed; however the' <br />City of Eugene can and will annex through extra-territorial' <br />extension with individual property annexation agr~ements <br />(black-mail) with only a promise of sewers in the futtire: and <br />maybe not within this century with full city taxes after five <br />years. She requested omission of the words "City of Eugene! <br />regarding River Road/Santa Clara. <br /> <br />8.Wanda Simmons, (see also written testimony III-I-I), llRI., <br />Skipper, Eugene, OR 97404. She opposed annexation of Ri~1 <br />Road/Santa Clara area. She brought attention to House Bill 2~ <br />amending Section 1 ORS 199.410 to read "Local ComprehensivE <br />plans define local land uses but may not specifically define whicl <br />units of local government are to provide public services whey <br />those services are required". Page IV-A-19 of the Proposec <br />Metropolitan Plan amendments document proposes that the City oj <br />Eugene will construct and own the main sanitary sewage systeD <br />necessary to serve the River Road and Santa Clara area. ShE <br />felt this should be deleted. She requested adoption oj <br />amendment (C) of Lane County Planning Commission proposal. <br /> <br />9. Michael Chellis, (see also written testimony, pg. 1II-F-l anI <br />1I1-L-l), Attorney representing KEZI, 101 E. Broadway, Suitl <br />200, Eugene, OR 97401, requested a comprehensive plm <br />amendment in the form of a plan diagram change to show th( <br />KEZI station site as a permitted commercial use in thE <br />appropriate color. Station site is 2225 Coburg Road, Eugene, <br />Oregon and the business has been in acutal operation at thaI <br />site for several years. <br /> <br />10. Phil Rose, 4026 W. 11th, Eugene, Or 97402, referred to page <br />1V-A-21 of proposed amendments to the Plan, il7, which reads: <br />"No particular section of the Metropolitan Plan shall bE <br />interpreted as prohibiting the process of incorporation of a n~ <br />J city in River Road/Santa Clara in accordance with ore~('1 <br />I Revised Statues, Chapter 221." He requested removal o{ the d;, <br />l . '\\J <br /> <br /> <br />II-4 <br /> <br />-,.-. <br /> <br />:l~ <br />