Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Application, Referrals and Public Hearing Notice <br />The property subject to this request is the State of Oregon Motor Pool site, located at the southeast comer <br />of Pearl Street and 4th Avenue. It is approximately 1.71 acres in size. The property is currently being <br />used as surface parking for State motor pool vehicles. On April 21, 2006, the owner's representative <br />submitted applications to the City of Eugene for amendments to the Metro Plan as well as a concurrent <br />rezoning. Following the receipt of the City's completeness review comments, the applicant provided <br />supplemental materials on June 8, 2006. On July 14, 2006, the City requested additional information <br />related to compliance with Statewide Goal 12, Transportation, and potential transportation impacts. On <br />July 24 and August 21, 2006, the applicant submitted additional revised findings for Goal 12. On July 28, <br />2006, the application was deemed complete without the additional requested information, at the <br />applicant's request. <br /> <br />The applicant's original submittal did not provide specific data related to the potential impacts of the <br />proposed plan amendments on transportation facilities. Staff concluded in its September 12, 2006 <br />Findings that there was insufficient information in the submittal to demonstrate compliance with Goal 12, <br />which requires that the allowed land uses under the proposed designation be consistent with the identified <br />function, capacity and performance standards of existing and planned transportation facilities. At the <br />Planning Commission public hearing on September 19, 2006, there was a majority agreement amongst . <br />Commissioners that basic traffic data would be needed to demonstrate compliance with Goal 12. As <br />requested by the Planning Commission, the applicant submitted trip generation estimates on October 10, <br />2006. <br /> <br />As detailed in the attached staff report, referrals were provided to the appropriate agencies, and notice of <br />the public hearing was mailed and posted consistent with Eugene Code requirements (described further in <br />Attachment A, Findings). No letters of public testimony were received between the date of public notice <br />(August 18, 2006) and the date of the Planning Commission public hearing on September 19, 2006. <br />There was no public testimony at the Planning Commission public hearing, and no additional public <br />testimony was submitted while the record remained open (until October 10, 2006). <br /> <br />Applicable Criteria <br />The Eugene Planning Commission shall address the relevant approval criteria from sections 9.7730(3) <br />and 9.8865 of the Eugene Code (EC) in making recommendations to the Eugene City Council on the <br />proposals, as listed below. <br /> <br />EC 9.7730(3) Criteria for Approval of Plan Amendment. <br />The following criteria shall be applied by the city council in approving or denying a Metro Plan <br />amendment applic,ation: <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by <br />the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment. must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />EC 9.8865 Zone Chane:e Approval Criteria. <br />Approval of a zone change application, including the designation of an overlay zone, shall not be <br />approved unless it meets all of the following criteria: <br />(1) The proposed change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan. The written <br />text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro Plan diagram where apparent <br />conflicts or inconsistencies exist. <br />(2) The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable adopted refinement plans. In the <br />event of inconsistencies between these plans and the Metro Plan, the Metro Plan controls. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />