Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Poling said he originally intended to vote in opposition. He commented that the council could not <br />even "get through [its] own business" and yet found time to weigh in on federal issues. He indicated he <br />would support the resolution, however. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon did not think there had been adequate public participation in this item. She pointed out <br />that there was an alternative path; that councilors and citizens could write letters as individuals. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor commented that he was normally disinclined to address issues that were far away from the <br />business of the City. He said there were many issues that were appropriate in a larger forum that did not <br />involve the City, its jurisdiction, and what it had to do. He thought once in a while, an issue came forward <br />that, while not directly related to the City, was so important in its impact that the City should at least take a <br />stand. He stated that torture was reprehensible. He supported the resolution, but stressed that he would not <br />support every big issue that came before the council. He encouraged the council to reserve such resolutions <br />for very special instances given that the council had a lot of business to conduct for the City. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Solomon voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> Resolution 4831 Forming a Local Improvement District For Paving, Constructing Curbs and <br /> Gutters, Sidewalks, Pedestrian Medians, Street Lights, and Stormwater Drainage on River <br /> Avenue From 200 Feet East of River Road to 100 Feet West of Beltline Highway <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked Michelle Cahill, Principal Civil Engineer for the Public Works Department, to <br />provide a brief overview of the proposed resolution. <br /> <br />Ms. Cahill stated that the public hearing was primarily to consider whether a local improvement district <br />(LID) should be formed for River Avenue. She reported that the initial hearing had been held by a Hearings <br />Official in the summer of 2004, and was continued before the council because of the number of <br />remonstrances received at that hearing. She said the Lane Board of County Commissioners reconsidered its <br />action of the summer of 2004 as well, and approved an order in February 2005, that authorized the City to <br />assess the ten unincorporated properties that had frontage on River Avenue. Additionally, she stated that the <br />contractor had agreed to hold to its original bid at the prices of the summer of last year. She indicated that <br />the street plan was consistent with the arterial collector street plan and with the County's standards for an <br />urban major collector. <br /> <br />Ms. Cahill outlined the changes that had been made to the design standards for the project: sidewalk width <br />was recommended to be changed from ten feet to five feet on a setback walk and six and a half feet for a <br />curbside walk. She said in order to minimize the right-of-way action and conflicts to the trees, the City <br />planned to "meander" the sidewalk. She indicated the third exception to the design standards was the <br />inclusion of a turn lane at the west end of the project. She reminded the council that it was scheduled to take <br />action on April 20, 2005. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for a five-minute break at 9:01 p.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 11, 2005 Page 11 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />