Laserfiche WebLink
Chuck Meeker, 309 River Avenue - 333 River Avenue, owner of Clemens Marina, said the project, as <br />designed, was ~way out of control." He referred to comments by Ms. Cahill in which she had indicated that <br />River Avenue was classified as a major collector street, with traffic volumes in the mid-range of the major <br />collector standards on the west end. He reiterated that the street was. 8 miles long. He thought the traffic <br />count numbers dropped dramatically once one drove past the post office. He questioned the wisdom of <br />spending that kind of money on the entire road, given the dearth of traffic on the east end of it. He noted, as <br />a point of information, that McKenzie View Drive, a 6.1 mile road with 82 driveways and 15 guardrails, <br />had been replaced for $827,000. It seemed to him foolish to spend $2.2 million on a road that was only .8 <br />miles long. <br /> <br />Daniel Hill, 863 Mint Meadow Way, Springfield, said he owned two businesses, one of which was located <br />on River Avenue. He agreed that improvements such as curbs and gutters were needed. He noted that <br />stormwater drainage had always been a problem on the avenue. He stated that he was an avid runner who <br />traversed the river bike path several times per week, traveling from one of his businesses to the other. He <br />related that in eight years, he had seen two or three pedestrians along the avenue. Regarding a connection <br />from the bicycle path to River Road, he opined that Owosso Drive already provided a quiet connection. He <br />predicted that greatly improving River Avenue would encourage drivers to speed. He said some drivers <br />already drove 50 miles per hour and more as they traveled from River Road to the Beltline Road. He asked <br />the council to please reconsider the project and seek to reduce its scope and costs. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly asked staff to respond to a piece of written testimony that suggested an alternate design for <br />bicycle access other than on-street bike lanes. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked those who testified. She asked that the public hearing be extended until 5 p.m. on <br />April 12 in order for the River Road Community Organization to submit a statement following its meeting, <br />held concurrently with the council meeting. <br /> <br /> Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to keep the <br /> public record open until 5 p.m. on April 12. Roll call vote; the motion <br /> passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked what the plans were for the River Avenue underpass if access to Beltline Road was <br />closed off. He also asked what the cost difference would be to conduct the work at night. He commented <br />that there were many similarities between testimony on the River Avenue improvements and recent <br />testimony on improvements that had been planned for the Crest Drive/Storey Boulevard area. He averred <br />there must be a better way to design the project. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked, if this was an access to Beltline Road, why did ODOT not have an interest in <br />some of the right-of-way and why was it not participating financially in the project. She observed that there <br />was no desire on the part of the property owners to move forward and wondered if there was an ability to <br />place a moratorium on any development that would increase intensity. She also wished to know if the <br />Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission would be assessed. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor indicated he would look into that and provide the answers on April 20. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 11, 2005 Page 14 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />