Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LC 12.225 M,trD Plan ApprovlIl 01 II Plan Am,nl"""t./Eug,,,, Code .9..7715} <br />(6) Type 11. . (II) Between the City Limits IInd Pllln Boundary. To become effective, a Metro Plan <br />Type II amendment between the city limits and the.Plan Boundary.must be approved by the Home City <br />and Lane County. Exception: If the non-home City, after referral" of the proposal, determines that the <br />amendment has Regional Impact, and, as a result of that determination, chooses to participate in. the . <br />hearing, all three governing bod;es.must appro~e the amendment. <br /> <br />See Attachment 4 for the Public Notice & Referral sent to City of Springfield in November. 2005 and . <br />. . their response, which was considered. by Springfield City Council for detennination of any regional <br />impact on November 4, 2.005. Springfield chose not to participate in the hearinp.at this'time, leaving <br />Eugene and Lane .Coun~ to conduct the tw~ jurisdiction .pproval process. . <br /> <br />Metro Plan ~endment Criteria <br /> <br />LC 12.225 (2) CrlterJf for ADD~ oiP/tIII Amf.nd1lre,~ (Bugene Code 9. 1730(3)} . <br />The followi"g criteria shall. be applied by the BOard of Comtldss,oners ill approving or denying a plan <br />amendment application: _ . <br />. (II) The amendment must be consisterit wiihthe relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted <br />by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and . <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment must not rirake the Metro Plan Internally'lnconsistent. <br /> <br />,.;.. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />Review. for conformance with. the Statewide .Planni~g O~a1s and. the. Oregon AdmiDistrative Rules. <br />. oCcurs lateI' in this report. LaDe. County and the City of Eugene are required to COD)ply with the Oregon <br />Administrative Rules (OAR's) that implemeni the Statewide Planning Goals.' Metro Plan PolicY is. <br />, implement~ by iden~ significant aggregate Goal S. sites as Sand & . Gra~el ~esources by Plan' <br />. . .~ignation and- the appropriate zoning pursuantto the Goal S Rule. . <br /> <br />OAR .66U23-180(2): "Loct1l go~ are not required toainend aclcnowledged Inventories or <br />p~ns with regard to mineral and aggregate resourCes aCept In rnponse to 1111 -ttppUctltlo,,/or II <br />PAPA., or at ~riodic r~ew.as s~ecifled in Section (9) of this. rule.. . . <br /> <br />This proposal is. a request. for:a Po~ Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (P Ai>> A) to add this site to the <br />. significant Mineral & Aggregate Resource Inventory. The property .owner Submitted the application as <br />a PAPA ~.August 200S. . <br /> <br />.D. ~ysi8 <br /> <br />Lane County is required to amend the ack;nowledged mineral and aggregate inventoJ;Y in response to <br />this appli~on for.. Post A~knowledgem~ Plan'AmendDient (pAPA). The Rule evaluation criteria <br />for a PAPA are separated into sev~ analytical steps for this projeCt: <br /> <br />Step 1. <br />Step 2. <br />Step 3. <br />Step 4. <br /> <br />St.ep 5. . <br />Step 6.. <br /> <br />Determine if the PAPA information is adeq~ate. . <br />Determine if the resource site is signifi_. <br />Determine if conflic~ from mining can be ~ed. . <br />W ~igh the ESEB consequ~ces of un-minimized conflicts arid determine whether to allow <br />mining. . ... . . .: <br />Detennine the ESEE consequences of potential new ~conflictirlguses within the impact area. <br />I?et~e if the rezoning req~ements of LC16.2S2 are met, and if the variance setback <br />request 'should be granted under LC 16.271(7). Only the Boar~ will consider and make the <br /> <br />Board/CoUncil Heating ~Ordinance No.' PA 123'8 . <br />Agenda Cover Memo <br /> <br />De1tI Sand &, Ofavel Expansion . <br />