Item A: Public Hearing onMetro Plan Amendment (Delta Sand and Gravel)

Home Browse Search

decision on thc.rezoning and v~~ce' because it is a Lane Code ~h8pter 16 amendment and decision implementing the Metro Plan amendment. Step 7 Developa. program to allow mining. . STEP 1: ADEOUACY OF THE ~FORMATION OAR 660-023-0180(2) (II): A/oealgovernment may inventory mineral and aggregate resources throughout ita Juri,diction, or in a portion of its jurls~;ction, When a local government conducts an Inventory of mineral and aggregate sites in all or. ~ portion. of ill juriSdiction, it. sh~ll follow the require~nta of. OAR' 660-023-0300 except as mOdljied by subsection (b) dfthis section with respect to aggregate sites. When a local government is following the inventory processfor a mineral or aggregate resource site under a PAl' A, It shalllollow th~ requirements of OAR 660-023-0030, except wher~ those requirements are expanded or ~rcededfor aggregate resources as provided In.subse~tions (b) thr~ugh(d) of this section and sectioIU (3)~ (4), and (8) of this rule,' . I. . OAR 660-023-0300 (8) In order to, determine whether information in a PAPA Submittal coneeming an aggregate site is adequate; local goveriiment .shall follow the req~ireme. ,of this aec';on rather than . OAR 660-023-0030(3). An application for approvafof an aggregate Site.fol'owing sections (4) and (d) ,of this' ,rule shall be adequate if it provides sufftcient information to determine whether. tlie req~i,ements in those ',ections' are satisfied. 4n appliCIJtioll for a PAPA co~eniing a ,ignljicant . · . aggregate 8i~e follC!wlng sections (3) ,and (5) of this rule s/uill be adequate 'if it includes,- (II) 1"'ornl4tion' regarding, qUantity, . quality, and loeation'. sufftcieni . to determine whether '~he standards' and conditions in secti~n (3) of this ~/e a~e satisfied,' . ,. , The deteriDination of site significance due to qualitY, qualityt and site location as contiguous to an existing mining opefation is'discussed in det8il Under Step 2,' below. (b). A conceptual site reclamation plan,. (NOTE.' Final approval of reclamation plans resides with DOGAMI rather dum /ocalgOvemments, except as provided in ORS 517.780) .. . " The expansionsitc.is proposed for consi4eration 88m amendment to .thcreclamation plan approved by DOGAMIin1987 and199S. See FOe Record No.l7 and EDlbit 49. , ~(c) ,A traJlic impact assessment Within one mile of the entrance. to the mining area pursuant to section. . (5)(b)(B) of.this nUe; , ' . . 'Lane CQuntY Transportation Plstnn~ng haS waived the .traffic itDpact analysis requirement under LC 15.697 (1) ~ see EDlblt 30. Substantial improvenien~ to the road system in this ' ,.,. . area ~ pJannedand scheduled out for the next twf4Y years in tranSportation system plana. (d) ,ProposalS. to minimize any conflicts with existing uses preliminarily iden:tifted' by the applicant within a 1,500foot impact area,. and . " . Proposals to minimi7~ conflicts with e~sting uses. are. included . ,in the application' and . identify the potential contlicts that have been considered in'.the pubHc involvement ~s. . Step 3 analyzes the cOnflicts JTIini1n1~tion proposals in depth. . . . (e). A site plan indicating the location, hours of operation, and other pertinent information for all proposed mi~i"g and associated uses. . . there is a site plan in the.application~ The Lane County PlaDnlng Commission voted 4-~ that there' wa~ adequate information submitted in the PAPA ~ppn~tioD. The Eugene' Planning CObimissiOD found ~nanimouslythat there was adequate l~onnatloD submitted .in. t~e PAPA appUeation. .' , BoirdICoun~i1.Hearing -~e No. P A 1238 ' . Aamda Cover M~o . J?elta Smd & Gravel Expamsion . . .~