Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager Dennis Taylor introduced Kent Kullby of the Planning and Development <br />Department. Mr. Kullby reviewed the actions before the council, saying the council would hear <br />testimony on two actions proposed for the Walnut Street Station area. The first action was an <br />amendment to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Diagram and <br />a concurrent amendment to the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Area Study (SAS) Land <br />Use Diagram to add the \ND Nodal Development symbol to the Walnut Street Station area. The <br />plan amendments would not change the existing base land use designations in the Metro Plan or <br />the SAS. The second action was a concurrent zone change to add the \ND nodal development <br />overlay zoning to properties within the area. The zone change would not change the existing base <br />zoning for the properties. <br />Mr. Kullby noted that the relevant criteria for evaluating a proposed Metro Plan amendment were <br />found in Section 9.7730(3) of the Eugene Code, including in the agenda item summary. The <br />criteria for evaluating the zone change were found in Section 9.8865, also contained in the <br />summary. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby noted the submission of written testimony since the packet was printed from Steven <br />Mandrell, David Wade and Nancy Pobance, and Jeff Morton, and said copies of the testimony <br />were provided to the council and placed in the public record. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby noted the public process that had already occurred in regard to the proposals before <br />the council. All the testimony submitted in those processes was included in the packet and <br />indexed. Oversized exhibits from those processes were placed before the council in the meeting <br />room. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby responded to residents' request to exclude all or most of the R-1 area of the node <br />north of 17th Avenue to 15th Avenue. He said that staff had prepared maps and an analysis of the <br />residential densities that would result from the adoption of three boundary alternatives offered by <br />the residents, included on pages 319 and 323 of the council packet. Mr. Kullby said that the <br />Planning Commission recommended that the council retain the proposed boundaries with the <br />recommendation that a detailed comprehensive plan be developed with the residential and <br />commercial stakeholders in the area in the future. However, the Planning Commission did not <br />recommend applying the \ND overlay zone until certain provisions of the overlay zone had been <br />amended. <br /> <br />In addition, Mr. Kullby reported the Planning Commission found the zone change inconsistent <br />with Policy 3 of the Fairmount/University of Oregon Special Area Study, which stated that zone <br />changes to increase residential densities or commercial intensity were not supported by the plan. <br />The policy was included in the packet on page 293. Excerpts from the study were submitted in <br />the record and could be found on page 390. Mr. Kullby reported that the ordinances before the <br />council address Policy 3 of the SAS with findings of consistency with Policy 3 because the \ND <br />overlay zoning narrowed and refined the range of uses already allowed in the base zoning, and <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 12, 2003 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />