Laserfiche WebLink
because the overlay did not propose to increase the maximum densities or allow more land uses <br />within the base zoning districts. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby noted that final council action on the ordinances was scheduled for May 27 at 7:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Steve Gab, 1818 Villard Street, co-owner of R-4 zoned property at 15th Avenue and Walnut <br />Street, said he refused to support the proposal because the Planning Commission refused to <br />redraw the boundaries. He questioned why the properties owned by Williams Bakery and <br />University of Oregon were not included in the proposed node's boundaries. He believed that the <br />low-density residential area should not be included in the node. Mr. Gab said that most of the <br />people in opposition to the node would favor the node if their wishes had been listened to during <br />the Planning Commission process. As the owner of the R-4 zoned property, he thought the nodal <br />overlay would benefit his property and the overlay zoning would mitigate its impact on the <br />adjoining properties. He noted his submittal of an alternative boundary proposal, Alternative 3. <br />He said that many citizens opposed to the current node supported his alternative boundary <br />suggestion. <br /> <br />George Rodie, 1917 Franklin Boulevard, EuroAsian Automotive, said his location had been an <br />auto repair business since the 1930s. He had invested his savings into the property, and was now <br />present because he heard about the council's hearing on the nodal area proposals from someone <br />else. He questioned why he had not been contacted about the proposal given its severe impact on <br />his business. He did not support nodal development because it eliminated land uses having <br />anything to do with automobile services. He suggested that to lower traffic congestion, auto <br />services need to be close to where people live and work. <br /> <br />Mr. Rodie said that as written, the zoning overlay requirements regarding floor-to-area ratio for <br />new development would not allow him to improve or expand his businesses. Any investment <br />would require the construction of a two-story building on a very small lot at a high cost. He <br />asked the council to reject the concept. He said the proposals negatively affect his personal life <br />and his life savings. <br /> <br />Jeff Morton, 93109 Powerline Road, representing the Quality Inn and Days Inn on Franklin <br />Boulevard, said that his company owned the largest parcel in the node. He said that his company <br />had originally been in favor of the concept, but when he had examined the proposal more closely <br />he had become concerned about the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) requirement. If passed, the <br />ordinance would require his firm to build a 250,000 square building on 250,000 square feet of <br />ground. He said that the company was doing a feasibility study regarding redevelopment of its <br />site as a new four-story hotel of about 45,0000 square feet. If the proposal was adopted, the <br />company would not redevelop the site, which could add jobs and visitor dollars to the community. <br />Mr. Morton asked the council to review his written submittal. It appeared that the cost of <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 12, 2003 Page 4 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />