Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit C <br />Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation <br />fa Annexation Request for Brabham, Jesse <br />(City File: A 18-2) <br />Application Submitted: May 14, 2018 <br />Applicant: Jesse Brabham <br />Property Included in Annexation Request: Portion of Tax Lot 109 of Assessor's Map 17 042313 <br />Zoning: R-1 Low Density Residential with AULUrbanlzable Land Overlay <br />Location: 1127 and 1129 Maclay Drive <br />Representative: Marvin Brush <br />Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gloello, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541682-5453 <br />EVALULATION: <br />Bared on the Information provided by the applicant the City has determined thatthls requestcomplles <br />with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexatlon -Applicability. As such, It Is subject to revlewand <br />approval In accerdanccwlth the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below In bold typefacewlth findings and <br />conclusions following each. <br />EC9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed swithin the city'surban growth boundaryand is: <br />(a) Contiguousto the citylimits, or <br />(b) Separated from the city onlyby a public right of wayor a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body of vuater. <br />Complies <br />Findings:e annexatlon area iswIthIn the City's urbanwowth boundary(UGB), and is <br />c ntiguousThto the City limits, censlstentwlth subsection (a). <br />NO <br />YES <br />EC9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />any applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several poll des from the M coup Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service <br />NO <br />YES <br />provisions within the URGE, Including the following policies from the Growth <br />Management rection (In Italic text): <br />P011cyB. fund with In th e UGB may be convertedfrOm urbanlzable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city when itlsfound that <br />a. A minimum level of key urbrnfacipties and services can be provided to the <br />Ordedyand efficient manner. <br />b. Th ere will be a logical area and time with In wh lch to deliver urban services <br />andfacllPles. Conversion of urbanlzable land to urban sh A drop be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page 11 Cd) <br />Po11ry10. Annexation to a city th rough normal processes shall continue to be the <br />high ant priority. (page 11{5). <br />Jesse eaenam(13 2) September 20 13 Pwe1 <br />