Laserfiche WebLink
Jesse Brabham (A 18-2) September 2018 Page 2 <br />Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time frame for <br />annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from urbanizable to <br />urban. (page 11-C-5) <br />The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable: <br />Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with <br />the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing agricultural zoning <br />may be continued within the area between the city limits and UGB until rezoned for <br />urban uses. <br />The Metro Plan designates the annexation area as appropriate for residential use. The <br />River Road - Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the adopted refinement plan <br />for the subject property and also designates the area for residential uses. The property is <br />currently zoned Low -Density Residential with Urbanizable Land Overlay (R-1/UL). The <br />/UL overlay will be automatically removed from the zoning following annexation <br />approval. <br />With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is not located <br />within any of the described subareas. Further, none of the general "Residential Land Use <br />Policies" at Section 2.2 appear to be directly applicable to the subject request. The <br />"Public Facilities and Services Element" policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at local <br />government; however, the premise of these policies (regarding the provision of urban <br />services) is the assumption that the property within the UGB will be annexed. <br />As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3) <br />below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management <br />policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation <br />procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found <br />throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law. <br />Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable <br />policies of the Metro Plan and applicable refinement plan. <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an <br />orderly, efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a <br />boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be <br />® <br />❑ NO <br />YES <br />provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below: <br />Wastewater <br />According to the as -constructed drawings, an 8 -inch public wastewater line exists within <br />Maclay Drive directly in front of the subject property, however, no connection record <br />was found. As an informational item, there is an on hold wastewater assessment for this <br />tax lot that will need to be paid prior to any development. <br />Jesse Brabham (A 18-2) September 2018 Page 2 <br />