Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Development Department using $70,000 from the Reserve for <br /> Revenue Shortfall in FY04. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon said fees could only legally be charged for services leading to a permit. She <br />said the current funding ratio was 96/4 with 96 percent of the funding being provided by permit <br />fees. She said providing information to the public was part of doing business for the City, given <br />the complicated nature of the city building code. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner said no matter how much money was provided for the PIC, he received nothing <br />but complaints about it. He raised concern that if there were no cuts there would be no motivation <br />to improve the service of the center. He stressed that the service at the PIC needed to change. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Kelly regarding the nature of the motion, City Manager <br />Taylor said the intent of the motion was to set broader guidelines and keep the discussion at the <br />highest level. He said he preferred giving the department the resources rather than targeting a <br />specific program. He said there had been improvements in the PIC and staff were working hard to <br />improve the service even more. He said the amendment would restore the budget that was <br />recommended by the City Manager on April 14. <br />Councilor Kelly said he would not support the amendment. He remarked that the motion was <br />more broad than restoring funding to the PIC. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the last task force for PIC met in 1998 and it had decided on a goal to <br />achieve full cost recovery from permits. She said that permit costs subsidizing general <br />information services was a myth. She said there was a public benefit to providing information but <br />reiterated Councilor Meisner's comments regarding complaints about the PIC. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey expressed a hope that the amendment would pass. He said that the more hurdles <br />placed in front of people who were trying to develop in the community, the less people would want <br />to develop in Eugene. He urged the council to have the courage to pass the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon remarked that Eugene was ranked poorly as a business friendly environment. <br />She noted that people needed general information just to know where to start on a permit <br />process. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the service was already being provided. She said the resources for <br />funding were already there but not being used efficiently. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said he would not support the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner said he would vote against the amendment. He said he would be more likely to <br />support it if the funding came from another program rather than the Reserve for Revenue <br />Shortfall. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said she would not support the amendment. She expressed a hope that the <br />department would allocate resources in such a way as to provide necessary information. <br />City Manager Taylor said the Budget Committee motion to take funding from the Permit and <br />Information Center and allocate it to the Safe and Sound program and came at a time when the <br />PIC was the subject of process improvement studies and had experienced budget reductions for <br />the last two budget cycles. He said he had been present at each of the work stations at the PIC <br />and had seen the detailed general information that was needed before getting a permit. He said <br /> <br /> MINUTES Eugene City Council June 23, 2003 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />