Laserfiche WebLink
Debbie Jeffries, 3800 North Delta Highway, spoke on the wetland inventory process recently <br />initiated by Planning staff to comply with the Goal 5 process. She stated that the aerial photos <br />that were being use in the initial stages of the process were five years old and, as such, were less <br />than adequate. She related that two modes of assessment were being used, one of which was to <br />use the outdated photographs and the other, should the property owner provide permission, was <br />to walk the properties in question. She said that Neil BjOrklund, lead staff in the inventory <br />process, had called the photos adequate but not ideal and had said that the consultants would <br />verify in the field any conditions that had changed since the photos had been taken. Ms. Jeffries <br />suggested that this was not entirely correct, as the property owner could choose to deny access or <br />could possibly not receive an inquiry for access, in which case the consultants were "simply going <br />to guess." She said that the budget for this process was not to exceed $72,000. She said that <br />with this amount of money, new aerial photographs for the purpose of assessing the criteria would <br />be a prudent investment. She felt that without new aerial photographs, staff would be flooded <br />with objections from property owners and the process would become more costly. Ms. Jeffries <br />reminded the council that the process had just begun because the City staff and the staff of the <br />Lane Council of Governments (LCOG) assigned to the project in 2000 had failed to read the <br />Oregon Administrative Rule 6.600(23) completely. She asked the council to direct staff to <br />provide a report to the council on the budget of the FTE time devoted to this process each year <br />until completion, the cost of up-to-date aerials, and whether staff believed $70,000 to be a <br />sufficient amount. <br /> <br />Majeska Seese-Green, 549 Van Buren Street, stated that she was president of the Whiteaker <br />Neighborhood Association and co-chair of the Neighborhood Leaders Council. She thanked the <br />council, on behalf of the two organizations, for putting more funding into the neighborhood <br />association newsletter and postcard notification budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Seese-Green said that she had been disappointed that this funding had been taken from the <br />Neighborhood Matching Grants program and not from the City reserves, as had been done for the <br />Permit and Information enter funding. She advocated for the revision of the Neighborhood <br />Matching Grants program, should it be continued in the future, so that it supported the <br />neighborhood associations and was integrated into the work of the neighborhood associations. <br />She felt that, in that way, it would help to build the neighborhood associations. She asserted that, <br />as it stood, the grant program undermined the neighborhood association because it did not seek to <br />leverage one project to connect with another project and that the grant program competed with <br />neighborhood associations for residents' energies. <br /> <br />Council President Pap~ closed the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor thanked everyone who spoke at the Public Forum. She expressed hope that it <br />would be possible to fund the cattery. She noted that someone had suggested licensing dogs, <br />stating that this was already being done, and wondered if the creation of a cat licensing program <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 14, 2003 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />