Laserfiche WebLink
15  <br />  <br />6. Professional Police Contacts: that Officer C treated RP3 unfairly due to his <br />race during his arrest. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommended Adjudications: <br />  <br />1. Use of Force – Supervisor A <br />• EPD chain of command: Within Policy <br />• Auditor’s Office: Within Policy <br />• Chief: Within Policy <br />2. Use of Force – Officer B <br />• EPD chain of command: Within Policy <br />• Auditor’s Office: Within Policy <br />• Chief: Within Policy <br />3. Use of Force – Officer C <br />• EPD chain of command: Within Policy <br />• Auditor’s Office: Within Policy <br />• Chief: Within Policy <br />4. Professional Police Contacts – Officer D <br />• EPD chain of command: Unfounded <br />• Auditor’s Office: Unfounded <br />• Chief: Unfounded <br />5. Professional Police Contacts – Officer B <br />• EPD chain of command: Unfounded <br />• Auditor’s Office: Unfounded <br />• Chief: Unfounded <br />6. Professional Police Contacts – Officer C <br />• EPD chain of command: Unfounded <br />• Auditor’s Office: Unfounded <br />• Chief: Unfounded <br /> <br />Issues for the CRB: <br /> <br />CRB members commented on how quickly the incident got messy and appreciated the <br />Internal Affairs Sergeant’s untangling of the facts. Discussion of policies noted that this <br />situation was a mandatory arrest issue due to the restraining order. One member <br />expressed concern that something as egregious as race-based policing would be alleged <br />when there was no apparent basis for it. Another member noted the officer’s teamwork as <br />they worked through the situation. <br />  <br />C. April Case Review <br />  <br />September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2