Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />3/14/2017 4/17/2017 33 Performance RP was unhappy that an officer who was <br />arresting him for disorderly contact told him his <br />vehicle would be given a courtesy tow, and now <br />has to pay over $300.00 to a tow company. <br />Sgt. found that the vehicle was found parked in an alley and was <br />towed for safekeeping, as it was a hazard. RP was never told it <br />was a free tow. RP did not return messages to speak about the <br />complaint. <br />3/15/2017 4/28/2017 43 Incident Review: <br />Conduct <br />Internal: An officer was alleged to have been <br />using his taser at parties and that a friend was in <br />photos posing with his firearm. <br />Sgt. found that officer had not yet been issued an EPD taser and <br />that the picture with a firearm was not EPD issued. No policy <br />violations were found. <br />3/15/2017 4/6/2017 21 Inquiry RP alleged that an EPD officer accompanied his <br />wife to court to intimidate and collect anything <br />that could be used against him at his criminal <br />trial. <br />Lt found that the officer had accompanied RP's wife to court but <br />did not go into the court room. <br />3/17/2017 3/24/2017 7 Policy RP is concerned about the illegal camping and <br />activity in his neighborhood. <br />Sgt. reached out to RP about the issues in his neighborhood and <br />discussed EPD's policy concerning illegal camping. <br />3/20/2017 5/31/2017 71 Inquiry RP inquired into the use of force used on his <br />daughter when she was handcuffed during a <br />stop. <br />Sgt. reviewed the stop and found that the officer had taken a hold <br />of RP's daughter in order to detain her for the citation. No policy <br />violations were found. Sgt. spoke with RP about the incident. <br />3/20/2017 4/21/2017 31 Incident Review: <br />Performance <br />RP was concerned at the response time for a <br />call for service for a robbery that she heard <br />about. RP suspected discrimination on the part <br />of EPD. <br />Sgt. reviewed the call for service and found that at the time of the <br />call 4 other higher priority calls were holding, and that the victim's <br />daughter had called back to 911 to let them know they would be at <br />the hospital and could be contacted there for a report. <br />3/20/2017 4/20/2017 30 Performance RP was unhappy with how a call taker handled <br />his call for a welfare check on a family member. <br />Supervisor reviewed the call and found that the call taker did not <br />get across that a call for a welfare check had been put through. <br />Supervisor left messages to speak with RP about her findings. <br />3/19/2017 3/31/2017 12 Performance Internal Review of a call taker not completing a <br />medic call. <br />Supervisor provided training and coaching on the proper procedure <br />forwarding out of area calls. <br />3/21/2017 4/17/2017 26 Policy RP was unhappy that an officer made her and 4 <br />other vehicles that were camping in the park <br />leave. <br />Sgt. learned that St. Vincent's had requested EPD assistance in <br />contacting over 20 campers/vehicles in violation of the overnight <br />parking camping ordinance. ICV showed that officer was <br />professional in explaining the issue and provided contact <br />information to those in violation while giving warnings. <br />3/22/2017 4/25/2017 33 Performance RP was upset that officers did not talk with her <br />after her roommate called police. <br />Sgt. reviewed records of the incident and found that officer spoke <br />with the calling party, no crime had been committed. No policy <br />violation. <br />Appendix B Page 6 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2