Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />3/23/2017 4/24/2017 31 Inquiry RP felt an officer did not have probable cause to <br />stop him for a traffic stop, in which his vehicle <br />was ultimately impounded. <br />Review of the officer's ICV found that the officer had made the stop <br />due to the inability to ready the unlit license plate. During the stop <br />it was revealed that RP did not have a valid license and that the <br />vehicle was not insured. No policy violation were noted by the <br />officer. Sgt. spoke with RP at length about the stop. <br />3/26/2017 3/28/2017 2 Performance <br />Dismissed: <br />Employee not <br />identified <br />RP reported an officer who ran a red light with no <br />lights or sirens. <br />Dismissed: unable to identify employee <br />3/27/2017 4/21/2017 24 Incident Review: <br />Conduct <br />Internal Review of a payroll overtime practice A review of the issue found the officer's supervisor had approved <br />the overtime. No policies were violated. <br />3/20/2017 5/18/2017 58 Inquiry RP complained that an officer saw him unlock <br />his bike, and a few days later his bike was <br />stolen. <br />Supervisor reviewed BWV and found that the officer was not <br />standing near RP when he unlocked his bike. <br />4/11/2017 4/14/2017 3 Performance RP was upset that the party in a dispute was not <br />arrested. <br />Lt. found that no probable caused existed for an arrest. Lt. spoke <br />with RP about the issue. <br />4/3/2017 4/28/2017 25 Performance RP did not feel officers correctly handled a <br />dispute between her and her neighbor. <br />Sgt. reviewed the steps officers took to handle the dispute and <br />found no policy violations. Sgt. spoke with RP and advised that <br />even though the neighbors' behavior may be unsettling to her it is <br />not illegal. <br />4/7/2017 4/17/2017 10 Inquiry RP reported an EPD vehicle speeding in a non- <br />emergency situation. <br />Dispatch records showed officers were being dispatched to <br />burglary in progress. Omitted lights and sirens were within policy. <br />RP was anonymous, so no follow up was attempted. <br />4/12/2017 5/22/2017 40 Inquiry RP, a non custodial parent, was upset with <br />officers explaining emancipation to his 15 year <br />old daughter and not allowing him to take her <br />home. <br />Sgt. found that officers had been alerted to a loud argument in the <br />downtown area and responded to find the father and daughter <br />arguing. The officers determined that no laws were being broken <br />and the RP was not the custodial parent. There was no probable <br />cause to detain the youth at the time. <br />4/16/2017 6/5/2017 49 Inquiry RP alleged that officers failed to deal with a <br />neighbor who was harassing him with racial slurs <br />and threatening his dog, telling him it was free <br />speech. He was also upset that he was then <br />arrested for strangulation. <br />Sgt. found that the officers were unable to identify the person or <br />person making the derogatory statements; the related incidents <br />were forwarded to a detective for further investigation. Review of <br />surveillance video from the strangulation incident clearly showed <br />RP had an opportunity to remove himself from the situation but did <br />not. Sgt. agreed with the officers' enforcement actions taken at the <br />time. <br />Appendix B Page 7 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2