Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />5/8/2017 6/15/2017 37 Performance RP was unhappy with an officer who pulled her <br />away from her husband who was having a <br />altercation with a motel clerk. <br />Sgt. reviewed the incident and found that RP was moved away <br />from the situation so officers could focus on the situation and not <br />on a third person. Sgt. spoke with RP about the applicable policies <br />and practices. <br />5/8/2017 6/6/2017 28 Policy RP reported an officer who he felt was hiding in a <br />parking lot in order to catch speeders and that it <br />was not legal for him to do so. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP about the difference between entrapment and <br />the officer hiding, and explained that the officer was not in violation <br />of the law. <br />5/8/2017 5/15/2017 7 Performance RP was unhappy with the hearing process with <br />her dog, stating it took over 5 months to have the <br />issue resolved. <br />Lt. found that the main issue of concern by RP was actually with <br />another agency. Referral was made to the correct agency. <br />5/10/2017 6/22/2017 42 Performance RP felt his son had not been treated well by <br />officers during a mental hold. <br />Sgt reviewed ICV and reports from the situation and found that <br />officers went beyond required policy to protect the privacy of RP <br />during the situation. RP did not return calls to discuss the findings. <br />5/6/2017 5/16/2017 10 Inquiry RP was upset that an officer demanded that she <br />return a vehicle; she believed she was the proper <br />owner. <br />Sgt. learned that the officer had spoken with the executor who did <br />not have proof of any transfer of the ownership of the vehicle. The <br />officer had the vehicle towed at on behalf of the executor. No <br />policy violations noted. Sgt. spoke with RP about the matter. <br />5/15/2017 6/22/2017 37 Inquiry RP alleged that an animal control officer struck <br />the curb going 40 miles an hour with in feet of <br />RP. <br />Supervisor found that the officer involved had moved over in the <br />lane to pass a car turning left but had no memory of striking a curb. <br />Supervisor spoke with RP about her findings. <br />5/15/2017 5/22/2017 7 Performance RP was upset that an officer failed to return his <br />license after citing him. <br />Sgt. reviewed ICV of the stop and found that the officer did indeed <br />return RP's license. The Sgt. notified RP of his findings. <br />5/15/2017 7/5/2017 50 Performance RP was unhappy that officers did not force a <br />homeless man with obvious mental issues into <br />treatment. <br />Sgt. reviewed the call for service pertaining to the complaint and <br />found that officers acted within policy. Sgt. spoke with RP about <br />the probable cause that must be in place before officers can force <br />a person to be seen for treatment. <br />5/15/2017 6/12/2017 27 Conduct Internal review of an issue with a grant program <br />that reversed its decision about providing EPD <br />with a drug dog. <br />Sgt. spoke with those involved and found no policy violations by <br />any EPD employee. <br />5/17/2017 7/5/2017 48 Inquiry RP inquired into whether or not it was ok for <br />officers to interview her children about a fight <br />between her and her husband without her <br />present. <br />Sgt. reviewed the details of the call and found that officers acted <br />within policy when speaking with RP's children. Sgt. spoke with RP <br />about the call and explained that officers are legally allowed to <br />speak with and interview the children. <br />Appendix B Page 11 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2