Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />7/26/2017 8/28/2017 32 Performance RP was unhappy that EPD misplaced his <br />property. The locker number he was given was <br />empty. <br />Sgt. learned that RP's property had been found in a different locker <br />and returned. Sgt. spoke with officer involved with a reminder to <br />pay attention to details. <br />7/27/2017 9/8/2017 41 Performance RP felt officer ignored her report of a neighbor <br />who leaves children home alone. <br />Lt. found no policy violation by officers and spoke with RP about <br />what probable cause officers need to file a report. <br />7/27/2017 7/29/2017 2 Policy <br />Dismissed: <br />Outside <br />Jurisdiction <br />RP alleged that CAHOOTS employees <br />discussed his medical information with people he <br />did not authorize. <br />Dismissed: Outside Jurisdiction RP was provided contact <br />information for White Bird (who employs CAHOOTS workers). <br />7/27/2017 8/28/2017 31 Inquiry RP was upset with an officer who accused him of <br />driving the wrong way on a street when he did <br />not, he believes it was an excuse to see if he <br />was intoxicated. <br />ICV of the stop did not capture the street where wrong way driving <br />was alleged, but it did confirm various traffic violations that lead up <br />to the stop. After confirming that the driver was not intoxicated he <br />was given a warning. The supervisor spoke with RP about his <br />findings. <br />8/2/2017 9/18/2017 46 Inquiry RP reported her motorhome being towed without <br />warning and that officers did not allow her time to <br />look for her cat. <br />Sgt. found that RP was given a 24 hour notice by the St. Vincent <br />camping program and that at the time of the tow officers gave RP <br />over and hour and a half to remove her belongings and retrieve her <br />cats. RP did not return calls made by the Sgt. to discuss his <br />findings. <br />8/2/2017 8/30/2017 28 Performance RP reported a motorcycle officer who was <br />swerving in and out of the traffic lane from the <br />sidewalk. <br />Review of the BWV showed the officer pulling into traffic from the <br />side of the road to go after a violator; no careless or unsafe <br />maneuvers were seen. <br />8/2/2017 9/18/2017 46 Performance RP alleged EPD officers have been following him <br />around demanding he move his vehicle. <br />Sgt. learned that the officers involved are on assignment with the <br />prohibited camping program and as such often contact those in <br />violation of the ordinance. Sgt. left a message with RP's contact <br />number to provide him with information about available services. <br />8/2/2017 9/5/2017 33 Inquiry RP was unhappy how officers handled a call for <br />service when he was assaulted. <br />Lt. reviewed BWV from the incident and found that RP did not <br />accurately relay what had happened to officers or to the Auditor's <br />Office. No report was warranted (though a record of the incident <br />was noted in dispatch records). Lt. agreed with the officers' <br />handling of the incident. <br />8/2/2017 9/5/2017 33 Inquiry RP complained that he was robbed and that <br />officers did not listen to him or take a report. <br />Supervisor reviewed video and dispatch records and found that the <br />involved employees acted appropriately. The supervisor contacted <br />RP with his findings. <br />8/2/2017 9/19/2017 47 Policy RP was unhappy that officers towed his <br />commercially marked vehicle and did not allow <br />him to take his equipment from the motorhome. <br />Lt. learned that officers had verified with St. Vincent's employees <br />that RP was a willful violator of the city ordinance. RP was allowed <br />by officers to remove equipment and property from the motorhome <br />before it was towed. <br />Appendix B Page 19 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2