Agenda Packet 9-24-18 Work Session

Home Browse Search

2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints Received Date Closed Date Time Open (days) Classification Summary Outcome 9/15/2017 10/30/2017 45 Inquiry RP inquired into why a situation that is not true can become a public record just because the police say so. RP did not return calls to discuss the situation made by the supervisor. 9/7/2017 9/21/2017 14 Inquiry RP was unhappy that no charges were brought against a suspect in an incident that she had been involved in. Sgt. reviewed police reports of the situation and found that officers had assessed the situation correctly and that no behavior was discovered that was a sufficient basis for a criminal charge. Sgt. spoke with RP about her concerns. 9/15/2017 11/17/2017 62 Policy RP was concerned that EPD would not taken a report form a 83 year old woman due to short- term memory issues. Sgt. learned that the issue was documented in a police report on the same day, and assigned to a detective for follow up. Investigation found that the alleged crimes were committed out of state in another jurisdiction. Sgt. spoke with RP about the findings. 9/21/2017 10/9/2017 18 Performance RP reported an EPD officer driving dangerously close to a car in front of him. Sgt. was able to determine the officer was en-route to a physical dispute call. Sgt. spoke with the officer about the complaint; RP did not return calls. 9/21/2017 10/30/2017 39 Performance RP reported an officer who was texting while driving. Sgt. found that the car number given by RP was not an EPD vehicle, but he spoke with his team about only texting in a work emergency. 9/25/2017 9/27/2017 2 Inquiry Dismissed: Outside Jurisdiction RP reported an incident that happened in another city. Dismissed: Outside jurisdiction 9/27/2017 11/14/2017 47 Inquiry RP was unhappy that an officer questioned her son, who was only sitting on the riverbank. RP did not return supervisor's calls to discuss the situation. 9/27/2017 10/6/2017 9 Policy RP reported an officer using his cell phone while driving, the length of time seemed excessive for it being a work related call. Sgt. spoke with RP about the cell phone law and what officers are allowed to do. Sgt. told RP he would let the officer know of the complaint. 9/27/2017 10/10/2017 13 Policy RP reported she felt humiliated by officers who responded with lights and sirens when she had only asked to speak to CAHOOTS. Supervisor reviewed the call and found that the call taker handled the call appropriately; officers are sometimes dispatched to CAHOOTS calls to ensure the safety of CAHOOTS employees. Supervisor spoke with RP about the situation. 9/28/2017 10/23/2017 25 Policy RP was unhappy that officers have not contacted her when responding to a continuing noise disturbance issue. Sgt. spoke with RP about her concerns and agreed to meet with her to identify the apartment the noise is coming from so that future calls can be handled in a more efficient manner. Appendix B Page 25 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2