Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />9/11/2017 10/6/2017 25 Inquiry RP was concerned that on officer opened the <br />door of his son's car during a traffic stop. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the stop and found that the driver indicated <br />to the officer his window was broken and that is when the officer <br />opened the door to facilitate the stop. The officer was polite and <br />professional. Sgt. spoke with RP about the stop and officered to let <br />RP come down and review the body cam. <br />9/12/2017 10/6/2017 24 Policy RP was concern about the service his sister was <br />receiving from EPD when she called about <br />trespassing on her property by the same man. <br />Sgt. found that at each call RP's sister declined to prosecute, and <br />each call was handled within policy. Sgt. spoke with RP and his <br />sister about the calls, EPD policy in each case and encouraged <br />her to continue to call and that in an emergency officers would be <br />dispatched. <br />9/14/2017 10/12/2017 28 Policy RP made a Facebook post about being unhappy <br />that an officer did not arrest a man who was <br />impeding traffic and being a public nuisance, <br />screaming and yelling at women and children in <br />the area. <br />Sgt. could not identify any officer working in the area described by <br />RP. RP did not respond to a request about more information. <br />9/13/2017 10/24/2017 41 Performance RP was concerned that her case had not yet <br />been sent to the DA's office. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP and updated her on the grand jury findings in <br />the case. <br />9/13/2017 10/19/2017 36 Performance RP was upset that after 3 days she had not <br />heard from anyone to take a report on a <br />fraudulent credit card issue. <br />Sgt. found that the officer had left a message about how to report <br />the issue on-line and RP's husband had submitted a report. Sgt. <br />spoke with RP about the miscommunication. <br />9/14/2017 11/2/2017 48 Performance RP was upset that officers filed breaking and <br />entering charges against her ex-husband. RP <br />feels police are not helping her in a situation <br />where her ex needs mental help. <br />Lt. assigned to complaint spoke with RP at length about what <br />police could do to help in the situation and providing information to <br />help with any future contacts with police concerning her ex. <br />9/15/2017 10/26/2017 41 Inquiry RP reported an officer was rude and threatening <br />with him when RP served a subpoena at the <br />officer's home. <br />Sgt. spoke with officer and found that he had returned home on a <br />day off and was startled by the person who served the subpoena; <br />in that startled state, the officer told the man to leave or he would <br />have him arrested for trespass. Sgt. noted to RP that he shouldn't <br />have been treated disrespectfully, but in the future subpoenas <br />should be served to officers at work. RP was happy with the <br />discussion. <br />9/15/2017 9/25/2017 10 Performance RP reported an officer that jumped the light, and <br />cut off a pedestrian. <br />Employee was unable to be identified by time and place reported <br />by RP. <br />9/15/2017 9/22/2017 7 Performance RP was concerned that officers informed the <br />recipient of a welfare check that RP had been <br />the one to call it in, despite RP's request for <br />anonymity. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the interaction and found that the officer did <br />not reveal RP's name. Sgt. spoke with RP about his findings. <br />Appendix B Page 24 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2