Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson remarked that the commission's annual work program was expansive and asked if <br />it was sufficiently flexible to allow the commission to address emerging issues. Ms. Ortiz said <br />she felt the work program was inclusive of those issues about which commissioners were <br />passionate. Mr. Dean responded that the work plan had been pared down over the past few years <br />due to staff reductions, and the commission was also sharing the work load on some projects with <br />Lane County and community organizations. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson asked if the commission would be willing to prioritize work program items in the <br />event that additional budget cuts required the scope of work to be further reduced. She expressed <br />appreciation for the commission's efforts to share responsibility for some program elements with <br />other agencies and asked for examples of those at a future date. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner echoed Ms. Nathanson's request for more information on programs that had been <br />successfully shared or %pun off" to other agencies. He noted several items in common in the <br />work plans for the HRC and Police Commission and expressed hope that staff resources could be <br />efficiently used and efforts of the commissions would not duplicate each other. He asked what <br />impacts the commission perceived State budget cuts to social service programs. Mr. Dean said <br />the commission had been contacted by individuals who were concerned about loss of benefits. <br />Mr. Van Steenbergen replied that the HRC and Police Commission, at a September 11, 2003, <br />meeting, established an ad hoc committee to explore efficient ways to work together on police <br />interaction with the community. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thanked commissioners and subcommittee volunteers for their work on behalf of the <br />City. She said it was difficult to quantify results or measure the impact of the commission's work <br />because it was proactive and preventive in nature and not as tangible as a construction project. <br />She sympathized with the commission's efforts to accomplish its work program with reduced <br />staff resources. She asked commissioners for their opinions onthe characteristics of candidates <br />the council should consider when filling HRC vacancies. She also asked if the commission's <br />work program was based on a model from another community and how it compared to work <br />being done, in terms of volume, in other cities. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz stated she would like to see better representation of youth, both on the HRC and other <br />boards and commissions. She said the HRC's Human Rights Support System was used as a <br />model in the Bethel School District for conflict resolution and PeaceHealth was using the HRC's <br />diversity program as a model. Mr. Dean agreed that the support system was a unique <br />accomplishment for the commission and the model was being shared with many other <br />jurisdictions and agencies. <br /> <br />Mr. Van Steenbergen said that there were profound human rights issues facing the nation and the <br />community and commissioners would continue to work on improving strategies and skills to deal <br />with those issues. He said the commission's work in the community was often invisible because <br />it was preventive in nature, but provided critical services to the City and to the public. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly commented that he had been the council's representative on the HRC since January and <br />said it was an honor and pleasure to work with such a passionate, committed, and informed <br />group. He also expressed pleasure with the quality of staff support provided to the commission. <br />He described the thorough and deliberative process the commission used to develop the work <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 22, 2003 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />