My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 WS
>
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:55:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. There was no consultation about any fee increases. No consultation about whether to extend <br />the legal contract - how long or with whom. No consultation about hiring Satre to facilitate a <br />meeting with Crest Neighbors. No consultation about returning a state grant for the purchase of <br />the Nectar/Dillard property. <br /> <br />3. I believe there has been a significant amount of change with an eye to making it better. <br /> <br />3. Dennis's vision or leadership direction is indistinguishable from previous administrations. <br /> <br />3. I will be very interested to watch what happens over the next year with long-term issues in <br />PDD (what will be the characteristics of the new PDD Director will be telling), and Cultural <br />Services Division (what will be the scope of the comp plan effort and what will its progress be). <br /> <br />4. I have often said at Council meetings that the organization insists on making new policy and <br />plans by studying what is in the rear view mirror. Organizational self-preservation seems to be <br />the prevailing approach to programs and plans, There is a distinct lack of interest, let alone <br />enthusiasm, for innovating successes enjoyed in other communities. I see no change with <br />Dennis's leadership. <br /> <br />5. The City Manager has promoted all efforts including joint CEO resolution, forums, etc. Still <br />much more is needed. <br /> <br />5. I have no doubt of the Manager's personal commitment to these issues from our discussions <br />during 1-on-l's. However, I have been very disappointed that the Manager has not used timely <br />opportunities in the public realm (e.g., at Council meetings) to comment on issues such as racial <br />profiling with a little emotion and outrage - public comments have sounded very guarded and <br />emotionless. <br /> <br /> 5. Dennis has shown to truly support efforts to have a Diverse Workforce. He encourages <br /> a discrimination free work environment. I hope the Organization catches up soon. <br /> <br /> 5. Dennis has established good rapport with the management team and gets good results from <br /> each department. <br /> <br /> 5. Since personnel issues are off-limits to Councilors it is not clear to me the role of the Manager <br /> in addressing recent criticism by our departing Diversity Coordinator. Did he contribute to the <br /> alleged problems; try to solve them; what is his approach? This was one of the reasons I <br /> requested an additional Manager Evaluation session with Dennis, so that we could ask these <br /> kinds of questions as a Council which is the only time we are permitted to discuss personnel <br /> issues. <br /> <br /> 5. Dennis continues to keep a pretty tight reign on communications between the Council and the <br /> executive management team that does not necessarily pertain to policy issues, but more along the <br /> lines of clarifying questions/comments. Certain communications can be made without <br /> interfering with a structured "chain of command". <br /> <br /> 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.