My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 WS
>
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:55:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Element B: Mayor and Council Support Overall Rating <br /> <br /> 1 2 3 4 5 Indicators <br /> _ _ x_ _ _ 1. Does the Manager develop an adequate range of <br /> clear options and recommendations for Council <br /> consideration? <br /> _ X _ _ _ 2. Does the Manager seek advice and direction on <br /> key issues from Mayor and Council? <br /> <br /> _ X .... 3. Does the Manager build positive working <br /> relationships with individual Councilors? <br /> <br /> _ X .... 4. Do Councilors have equal influence with the <br /> Manager? <br /> <br /> _ X .... 5. Is Council kept informed of critical issues in a <br /> timely manner? <br /> <br /> _ _ X_ _ _ 6. Does the Manager's staff provide timely and <br /> effective support to Council? <br /> _ _ _ X_ _ 7. Does the Manager choose appropriate and timely <br /> items when setting Council agendas? <br /> _ X_ _ _ _ 8. Are the Manager's oral and written <br /> communications comprehensive and <br /> understandable? <br /> <br /> X ..... 9. Is the Manager receptive to constructive <br /> criticism? <br /> <br /> X ..... 10. Are Council information-requests followed-up in <br /> a timely manner? <br /> <br /> Comments including examples of past performance to support your appraisal <br /> <br /> 1. He provides a range but only develops and supports the staff recommendation. <br /> 2. I don't know the experience of other councilors, but this is not true for me. <br /> Unfortunately, since it never happens, I don't even have an expectation that it should. <br /> 3. The manager is friendly and seems genuinely interested in familiarizing himself with my <br /> personal life and family. But in terms of a working relationship and helping to achieve <br /> goals important to constituents, there is no support from the manager; and in some cases <br /> he can be a formidable obstacle to finding realistic solutions for problems faced by city <br /> residents. Policing in Urban parks is one recent example. <br /> 4. The manager is not receptive to my analysis, strategy or ideas unless it is already part of <br /> his agenda. On a number of occasions, where he has strenuously disagreed with me, he <br /> has been publicly disrespectful and unprofessional. One example was my initiation of a <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.