My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 WS
>
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:55:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Element F: Financial Management Overall Rating <br />Satisfied <br /> <br /> 1 2 3 4 5 Indicators <br /> <br /> _ _ X_ _ 1. Does the Manager develop financial plans that <br /> allow City Council to anticipate and respond to <br /> changes in the City's finances? <br /> _ _ X_ _ _ 2. Do the budgets developed by the Manager reflect <br /> Council priorities? <br /> <br /> .... X _ 3. Does the Manager ensure that the City budget is <br /> based on a sustainable service and funding <br /> strategy so that ongoing expenses are supported <br /> by ongoing revenue? <br /> <br /> _ _ _ X_ _ 4. Does the Manager control expenditures in <br /> accordance with approved budgets? <br /> _ _ _ X_ _ 5. Does the Manager ensure that City financial <br />] ] matters are clear and available to the public? <br /> <br />Comments including examples of past performance to support your appraisal <br />By the time the Council and Budget Committee completed the Budget Process <br />the Budget reflected Council priorities for the Community which focuses primarily on Public <br />Safety. I appreciate that the Manager's proposed budget fully funded our contribution to the <br />Human Services Commission and some other baseline services that we have had to defend in <br />past years. So all things considered the process had its positives and negatives. We tend to <br />budget conservatively and I am supportive of that approach. <br />The one financial criticism I would levy is that the Manager has a tendency to claim there is no <br />money for a council action he does not support but when staff wants to pursue something they <br />tend to find the money. One example is the request for an appraisal of the property involved in <br />the McDougal deal. The manager was adamant that the cost was prohibitive. A credible outside <br />source differed with that opinion, and ultimately the cost was a not a significant factor. <br /> <br /> 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.