Laserfiche WebLink
<br />November 26, 2018, Work Session – Item 2 <br />Public Outreach As part of Phase 2 outreach, a series of four working group meetings were held to engage stakeholders in discussions related to significant key issues identified during Phase 1 of the project. Over the course of Phase 2, the interested parties list has grown to over 80 members. Meeting invites and reminders were sent to all interested parties. In addition, an outreach flyer was provided to various City committees such as the Housing Policy Board, the Sustainability Commission, Historic Review Board, and the Active Transportation Committee, and project updates were included monthly in the Envision Eugene e-newsletter that reaches over 1,500 community members. The project was also highlighted at the October 10, 2018, Planning Project Fair, which was attended by over 100 people. Over 40 stakeholders representing neighborhood associations and residents, housing builders and developers, design professionals, housing advocates, and affordable housing providers attended some or all of the four three-hour working group meetings. Meeting videos and materials, along with online surveys, were provided on the project website so that anyone wanting to participate had access to the required resources. Staff also offered four two-hour drop-in “office hour” sessions for anyone wanting to ask more questions about the project, the land use process, or the issues and possible concepts discussed at the working groups. <br />Planning Commission Review Planning Commission reviewed the Draft Preferred Concepts Report at a November 19, 2018, work session. In an effort to be both responsive and responsible to City Council’s direction while also addressing concerns raised by some stakeholders about lack of time, Planning Commission was asked by staff to focus its review on the maintenance issues and the less complex significant issues (identified in italics below). The intent is to allow stakeholders and the Planning Commission to take extra time on the more complex significant issues over the next month or so to ensure sufficient consideration and vetting, while the maintenance issues and less complex significant issues continue to move forward. • Compatibility for CUP, SR & PUD (COS-01) • 30-Foot Buffer Requirement For PUDs (COS-02) • Emergency Response (COS-08) • Conditional Use Requirement (COS-09) • Partition Tree Preservation (COS-10) • Site Review Requirement (COS-12) • 19 Lot Rule—Motor Vehicle Dispersal (COS-14) • PUD Requirement (COS-16) • Arborist and Landscape Architect Requirement (COS-18) • Pedestrian Definition(COS-20) • 20 Percent Slope Grading Prohibition for ST & PUD (COS-03) • One Acre Accessible Open Space For PUDs (COS-04) • Limitation Over 900 Feet For PUDs (South Hills) (COS-05) • Ridgeline Setback For PUDs (South Hills) (COS-06) • 40 Percent Open Space Requirement For PUDs (South Hills) (COS-07)