My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
Agenda Packet 11-26-18 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2018 12:58:33 PM
Creation date
11/21/2018 12:49:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.1 New Capacity Costs <br />Detailed cost estimates for each project included in the Transportation SDC <br />Project Plan were reviewed to determine what portion of project costs related to <br />replacement of existing capacity versus expanding existing facilities or <br />constructing new facilities. Existing facility replacement costs included overlay <br />or reconstruction of existing pavement, as well as replacement of existing <br />facilities (e.g., bridges or other crossings). This shows that, in calculating the <br />improvement fee, the City considered the projected costs of the capacity- <br />increasing capital improvements identified on the Transportation SDC Project <br />Plan. <br /> <br />2.2.2 Growth Share of Capacity Costs <br />For purposes of determining SDC-eligibility, individual projects from the <br />Transportation SDC Project List (“Project List”) are analyzed to determine first, <br />the portion of costs that expand or provide new capacity, versus replacing <br />existing system capacity. Second, the new capacity costs are further analyzed <br />to determine the portion of costs related to meeting the needs of future growth <br />(the “growth share”) versus costs associated with raising the level of service for <br />existing development. <br />The general methods used for determining the growth share of costs for each <br />project on the Project List are summarized below. These methods show that, in <br />calculating the improvement fee, the City considered the increased capacity <br />needed to meet the demands of future transportation system users. <br /> <br />2.2.2.1 New Roadways <br />New roadways and expansions driven by future development capacity <br />requirements are allocated 100% to growth, since the capacity is needed <br />entirely for new development. <br /> <br />2.2.2.2 Upgrades to Roadways and Intersections <br />Improvements to existing facilities to address safety, modernization, and <br />other performance considerations provide capacity for growth and <br />enhanced performance for existing development, so the costs are <br />allocated in proportion to the utilization of the facilities. Specifically, <br />weekday PM peak hour travel demand data by roadway link (from the <br />LCOG travel demand model) are used to quantify growth’s utilization of <br />future roadway and intersection capacity. The growth share is estimated <br />based on the growth in trips over the planning period, as a percentage of <br />total future trips for individual roadway links. If a link provides regional <br />‘through’ traffic capacity, an adjustment to the growth share is made to <br />exclude the portion of trips that represent “through” versus local trips. <br /> <br />2.2.2.3 Operational Improvements <br />Capacity enhancing improvements include new traffic signals, as well as <br />improvements that enhance intersections performance (accessible <br />pedestrian signals and master traffic communications plan). The growth <br />share for these improvements is determined based on growth’s share of <br />future person trips, as estimated from the LCOG travel demand model. <br />November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.