Laserfiche WebLink
Order Recommendation #2: Identify Specific Areas for Nodal Development <br /> <br />The Nodal Development implementation schedule directs local jurisdictions to "specify areas for nodal <br />development within one year" after adoption of TransPlan. The target date for completion of the task was <br />May, 2002 even though TransPlan was not adopted until December, 2001. <br /> <br />Site Selection for Pilot Project Areas Eugene's process for identifying specific areas for nodal <br />development proceeded in two stages. The first stage began well before TransPlan was adopted. In April <br />1997, the City applied for a TGM grant to assist with this process. The grant funded a demonstration of <br />transportation-efficient land use planning focusing on the preparation and adoption of a concept design, <br />strategies and ordinances for two potential nodal development sites identified in TransPlan. The project <br />was intended to serve as a "pilot project" to test a process and set of planning tools to implement the nodal <br />development concept. The grant agreement required the City to select one node in a redevelopment/infill <br />setting, and one node in a "newly developing" (undeveloped) area. Notice of the grant award was received <br />by the City in July, 1998 allowing less than one year for the selection of the sites and development of <br />specific area plans for both sites. <br /> <br />The process for selection of the two sites employed the Eugene Planning Commission as a recommending <br />body with the final decision resting with the City Council. City staff proposed a set of criteria for each site <br />to guide the site selection process. The site selection criteria for the Newly Developing Area were as <br />follows: <br /> <br />2. Site is included on the Draft TransPlan Proposed Nodal Development map. <br />3. Significant amounts of vacant or under-developed land remain. <br />4. The site is located on an existing or planned transit route. <br />5. Pressures for development are increasing. <br />6. Number of property owners within the nodal development area. <br />7. Proportion of land in larger parcels. <br /> <br />The criteria for the Infill/Redevelopment Area were modified as necessary to reflect the developed <br />character of these sites: <br /> <br />1. Site is included on the Draft TransPlan Proposed Nodal Development map. <br />2. The site contains a significant amount of land with medium-to-high redevelopment potential and/or a <br /> significant amount of land with infill potential. <br />3. The site is located on proposed Phase I Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route. <br />4. Number of property owners within the nodal development area. <br />5. Provides sufficient complexity so that a range of issues will be addressed, but not be too complex for <br /> the project timeline and budget. <br /> <br /> An interagency staff technical group evaluated five candidate sites and recommended two of those sites to <br /> the Planning Commission for the pilot studies. The sites ultimately selected by the Planning Commission, <br /> and confirmed by the Council, were West Royal (Newly Developing) and 11th and Chambers <br /> (Redevelopment/Infill). The specific area planning process for those two sites is further described in the <br /> section addressing Order Recommendation #3, below. <br /> <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> <br />